Computer Program Speeds Search for Novel Alloys

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Hundreds of thousands of possible metal alloy combinations can be formed from a relatively small number of elements. As a result, finding new metal blends with desirable qualities (such as rust resistance or heat conductivity) can be an arduous task. Now a team of Danish physicists has developed a new approach to this treasure hunt that moves the search from the laboratory bench to the desktop. A report published in the current issue of Physical Review Letters describes a computer algorithm that borrows from evolutionary theory to test which compounds hold the most promise for resisting high temperatures and corrosion.

Gisli J¿hannesson and colleagues at the Technical University of Denmark cybersifted through 192,016 potential alloys, each containing up to four different metals (out of 32 possible choices), using a genetic algorithm. The researchers started with a so-called living population of alloys with various compositions. The program then created new populations of alloys in one of two ways: breeding between two parent alloys, in which elements were interchanged to form child alloys; and mutations, which replaced one element in an alloy with a randomly selected substitute. The program then selected the most stable alloys according to density functional theory (DFT), which models interactions between electrons to predict a material's properties. By manipulating the candidate metals, the team could account for practical considerations such as the prices of particular elements.

The researchers ran a number of initial populations through their evolutionary computer program and found among their survivors some of the best superalloys yet known. Their list also contained several alloys that have either not been well studied or considered at all as candidates for superalloys. The authors conclude that "the purely computational approach may therefore be able to narrow down the number of experiments needed for the development of new materials."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe