New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Could Climate Change Put the Groundhog Out of Business?

With cold weather absent from much of the U.S. Northeast this year, what does a groundhog's shadow mean anymore?

The United States' smallest meteorologist must be scratching his head about now.

Each February for the past 125 years, Punxsutawney Phil -- the Pennsylvanian groundhog long considered a living symbol of Groundhog Day -- has sauntered from his burrow to cast a shadow on the weeks and months ahead. His predictions, though not always accurate, are cheered by hundreds of fans who flock to his den at Gobbler's Knob, a wooded hillock just outside the town that bears his name.

The ground rules for Phil's tradition have always been clear: If the groundhog sees his shadow, six weeks of winter are yet to come; if no shadow appears, then spring is on its way.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But with cold weather stubbornly absent across much of the Northeast this year and spring seemingly already under way, Phil may have beaten Old Man Winter to the punch. Now it's anybody's guess what a groundhog's shadow may portend.

"NEWS FLASH: Groundhog Day cancelled! Phil says he's pretty sure spring *already* arrived in western PA, preempting tomorrow's event," joked climate scientist Michael Mann in a Twitter post yesterday.

The winter of 2011-2012 is already among the top 20 warmest in historical memory, and is likely to earn a third- or fourth-place record in parts of New York and New Jersey, said Art DeGaetano, a climatologist and professor of Earth and atmospheric sciences at Cornell University.

That conforms to the trend of the past decade, which has seen three of the four warmest winters since meteorological data collection began, he said.

A mixed forecast
Much of the cold that would usually descend across the United States this time of year is trapped in a northern pressure system called the Arctic Oscillation, he said.

The warmer weather patterns have implications for animal species up and down the region, including Punxsutawney Phil and his fuzzy brethren, said Paul Curtis, a professor of natural resources and Cooperative Extension wildlife specialist at Cornell.

Groundhogs are one of the few animals that achieve true, or "profound," hibernation, burrowing down below the frost line for the coldest months of the year. During this period, which usually lasts from mid-October to late February, a groundhog's heart rate drops from 80 beats a minute to only three or four, and its body temperature falls by 60 degrees.

Warmer temperatures shorten hibernation, causing groundhogs to burrow later and rise earlier than is customary, said Curtis.

While this probably won't have a harmful effect on the woodchucks, other species will respond more strongly to the mild weather, with possible implications for humans, he said.

"The big one is deer," he said. "Mother deer emerge from mild winters with a lot more of their body fat still on them, meaning that they're less likely to drop stillborn calves. That can certainly make for a population swell, particularly when you have a number of warm years back-to-back."

Although deer can devastate plant life when their populations grow out of control, the real danger to humans comes from the ticks they carry, said Curtis. Deer ticks spread Lyme disease, a debilitating bacterial infection that can result in symptoms from chronic muscle aches to paralysis.

"We've seen a huge upswing in reported cases recently, from about seven in 2009 to 70 in 2010," he said.

Calm before the snap
There's another danger in the mild weather that might catch even the punctilious Punxsutawney Phil unawares. Plants and animals that have been lured out by the early spring could be caught at their most vulnerable moment by a sudden cold snap, said Curtis.

"When we look across the board, we see birds nesting and frogs calling as much as 20 days earlier than normal," he said. With the winter still undecided, a sudden snowfall could threaten their newborn young, he said.

DeGaetano said he thought it unlikely that a sudden snow would come this year. "Spring snows generally correlate with an El Niño year," he said. "We're in an El Niña year, which tends to bring a milder, drier spring."

"I'm not going to stick my neck out and try to predict what's going to happen at the end of February, but we don't see any warming activity for the next seven to 10 days," he said.

As for Punxsutawney Phil, if he has anything to say, he's keeping it to himself. He declined to comment for the purposes of this article.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe