New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Craving a Cure: A Virtual Meth House Serves as Fodder for Addiction Studies

Researchers turn to virtual worlds for real-world insights into addiction

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Virtual worlds offer millions of online visitors the chance to ride a dragon or build a fake real estate empire. Addiction researchers have discovered that these communities can also produce something very real—drug cravings—which may help scientists develop and test new treatments for substance abuse.

Researchers have struggled for decades with the problem of reproducing so-called environmental cues within the confines of a sterile lab environment. These reminders—a rolled-up dol­­lar bill, the smell of cigarette smoke—make users crave their drug of choice. The investigators stoke powerful cravings in their subjects to better understand the physiology of addiction and to reliably test whether a new drug or behavioral therapy can prevent relapse.

Chris Culbertson, a doctoral student in neuroscience at the University of California, Los Angeles, had read reports of alcoholics and smokers developing cravings while visiting virtual worlds devised by addiction researchers. He decided to use one of the largest online communities, Second Life, to study another intractable problem: addiction to the psychostimulant methamphetamine. Culbertson created a virtual meth house, a place where addicts gather, and invited 17 meth users to U.C.L.A. to test it out. To determine their levels of craving, Culbertson had the addicts fill out questionnaires and measured their heart rates as they navigated via computer through the meth house on Second Life. A recent study in Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior showed that Culbertson’s virtual-reality meth house bested other imagery in eliciting cravings, including a video of actors pretending to use the drug.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For now, Culbertson says, his virtual meth house is off-limits to the general public: “It would throw a monkey wrench into the whole thing if someone showed up in a dragon suit while we were doing an experiment.”

Gary Stix is the former senior editor of mind and brain topics at Scientific American.

More by Gary Stix
Scientific American Magazine Vol 303 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Craving a Cure: A Virtual Meth House Serves as Fodder for Addiction Studies” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 303 No. 4 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican102010-2MAmJjI29RZ2WlT0h2OfM4

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe