New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Creating Synthetic Silk from Microbes

Engineered bacteria produce silk-like fibers that are as strong as natural ones

Biosynthetic silk.

Christopher Bowen Washington University in St. Louis

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Spiders spin the stuff of engineers’ dreams. Their silk is as strong as steel, stretchy, nontoxic and biodegradable. But spiders are not easy to farm. Each produces only a minuscule amount of silk, and some are cannibalistic. For decades scientists have tried to mimic the silvery strands to use for sutures, athletic gear and bulletproof vests, but their synthetic fibers have fallen short. Now a team has coaxed bacteria to produce silk as tough and elastic as the natural version.

Researchers have previously transplanted silk-making DNA from spiders into bacteria, silkworms, plants and even goats in an effort to mass-produce the substance. Until now, however, the best engineered fibers have been only half as strong as the real thing. The secret to spider silk’s strength lies in large protein molecules composed of hundreds of strings of repeated amino acids encoded by similarly lengthy, repetitive DNA sequences. But “in general, nature does not like repetitive DNA and finds ways to get rid of it,” says Fuzhong Zhang, a professor of energy, environmental and chemical engineering at Washington University in St. Louis. Spiders have figured out how to stabilize the large DNA—but in other creatures, such repeated units get snipped or changed.

To circumvent this problem, Zhang and his colleagues modified the spider DNA involved in producing silk proteins. Microbes engineered with this modified DNA make silk protein molecules with a unique “tag.” The tags glue together two molecules to form the desired long chain and then fall off. The resulting proteins are longer than the largest natural proteins. The researchers made these proteins into a powder and mixed it into a solution that can be spun into fibers as strong as natural ones, they reported in September in Biomacromolecules.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Synthetic silk could be a sustainable alternative to petroleum-derived fibers such as nylon, Zhang says. But the challenge is producing it in sufficient quantities at low cost. The new approach may still face the same issue because the spinning solution is made with a corrosive and costly solvent, says Gregory Holland, a professor of chemistry and biochemistry at San Diego State University, who was not involved in the work. “The next step,” Holland says, “is working on [a water-based] solution to see if similar high-performance fibers can be produced.”

Prachi Patel is a freelance journalist based in Pittsburgh. She writes about energy, materials science, nanotechnology, biotechnology and computing.

More by Prachi Patel
Scientific American Magazine Vol 319 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Mimicking Spider Silk” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 319 No. 6 (), p. 19
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1218-19

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe