New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Da Vinci's Genius, Oliver Sacks on Consciousness and Other New Science Books

Book recommendations from the editors of Scientific American

War Machine drawing by Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519).

Getty Images

Leonardo da Vinci
by Walter Isaacson.
Simon & Schuster, 2017 ($35)

He created the Mona Lisa and The Last Supper and sketched the legendary Vitruvian Man. Yet his tremendous paintings are only part of the story. As historian and writer Isaacson painstakingly chronicles, Leonardo da Vinci was an obsessive learner and thinker who conducted extensive research on human anatomy, the mechanics of flight, optics and mirrors, to name a few. Unlike other Renaissance men of his time, he insisted on discovering things for himself rather than relying on the past work of others. In this way, he set the stage for the scientific method, demanding of himself meticulous observation, experimental procedure and reproducibility of results. Above all, this biography shows that his curiosity drove him in all things—to understand the nuances of the world, from the workings of the smallest feathered creature to the way light enters the human eye.

Spineless: The Science of Jellyfish and the Art of Growing a Backbone
by Juli Berwald.
Riverhead Books, 2017 ($27)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


After ocean biologist Berwald completed her Ph.D., she landed a job that left her unsatisfied—writing school textbooks on physics, far from the salty waters she loved. Working later as a journalist, she happened on a set of jellyfish photographs and was struck by these unique and mysterious animals. They captivated Berwald, so she decided to use her journalistic skills to dig deeper into their biology. In this memoir/science-reporting mash-up, she profiles one of the ocean's most intriguing creatures—theunique contractions it uses to propel through water, its acidifying habitat and its booming populations. Most of all, Berwald gets back to the ocean science she loves. —Leslie Nemo

The River of Consciousness
by Oliver Sacks.
Knopf, 2017 ($27)

This bricolage of posthumously published essays by polymath physician and author Sacks forms a brilliant whole, showcasing his lifelong fascinations with evolution, perception, memory, creativity and time. In one exemplary sequence, an essay about Darwinian botany and the locomotion of plants segues seamlessly into another exploring the neurological limits to the speed of thought, which leads into a third speculating about the mental lives of worms, insects and jellyfish—and beyond. By the end, the interconnected ideas and insights flow together like braided streams from Sacks's deep pools of knowledge, forming a final retrospective of one of our age's greatest scientific storytellers. —Lee Billings

Whitewash: The Story of a Weed Killer, Cancer, and the Corruption of Science
by Carey Gillam.
Island Press, 2017 ($30)

In the 1970s droves of farmers around the world bought the expensive weed killer Roundup. They laid it on heavy, too, applying 101 million pounds of glyphosate—the active ingredient—to soybeans during a 10-year span in the U.S. alone. Unlike other pest agents such as DDT, this chemical was touted as environmentally sound by its producer, Monsanto. But claims began to surface that glyphosate was a carcinogen that persisted in crops and food products. By digging through court documents, FOIA request findings and laboratory results, science writer Gillam traces the rise of the ubiquitous chemical and the controversy that erupted when farmers, researchers and concerned citizens started questioning what Monsanto was selling. —L.N.

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
Scientific American Magazine Vol 317 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Recommended” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 317 No. 5 (), p. 77
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1117-77

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe