Data Points, September 2006

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Pregnant With Implications

Cesarean sections declined in the seven years following 1989, when U.S. birth certificates first recorded methods of delivery. But recently they have spiked. Proposed explanations include an increase in multiple births and in the number of women more likely to have a C-section, such as those who are older, overweight or diabetic.—Brie Finegold

Percent of births delivered by cesarean section in:

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

2004: 29.1

1996: 20.7

1989: 22.8

Percent increase in twin births, 1990 to 2003: 37.1

Fraction of women in 2003 who gained prepregnancy weight beyond recommended guidelines: ⅓

Percent increase in mothers with diabetes, 1990 to 2003: 40

Percent change in birth rate from 1990 to 2003 for women ages:

20 to 24: −12

35 to 39: 38

40 to 44: 58

SOURCES: Division of Vital Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Institute of Medicine (weight guidelines)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American