New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Data Points: Time Spent

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

American kids may have become more serious about academics. Investigators from the University of Michigan Institute for Social Research surveyed 2,908 U.S. children and adolescents aged six to 17 years in 2002–2003 and compared the data with a smaller survey conducted in 1981–1982.

Hours spent per week:

                          2002–2003    1981–1982


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Sleeping                       68.2            62.63

Attending school            32.45           26.35

Watching television         14.6           15.73

Playing games                 8.08            7.33

Eating                             7.1              8.47

Studying                         3.97            2.63

Playing sports                   2.98           4.07

Using a computer              2.75             0

Reading                            1.28          1.15

SOURCE: Changing Times of American Youth: 1981–2003, by F. Thomas Juster, Hiromi Ono and Frank P. Stafford, University of Michigan, 2004. About 20 hours per week is unaccounted for in the 1981–1982 survey, as opposed to 45 minutes in 2002–2003.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 292 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Data Points: Time Spent” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 292 No. 2 (), p. 32
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0205-32a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe