New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Death Toll from Landslides Vastly Underestimated

An improved database shows that thousands more people die annually from landslides than was thought

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Sid Perkins of Nature magazine

Landslides claim an order of magnitude more lives each year than has been previously recognized, a study reports. Yet this annual toll of several thousand deaths worldwide may still underestimate the long-term average.

Although landslides, rockfalls and other 'debris flows' are common, the number of lives lost to them has been poorly quantified. This is mainly because databases tend to classify relevant fatalities as caused by the earthquake or weather event that triggered the landslide, rather than the landslide itself.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But David Petley, a geographer at the International Landslide Centre at Durham University, UK, has compiled his own global database using government statistics, aid-agency reports and research papers. Writing in Geology, he reports that between 2004 and 2010, 2,620 fatal landslides killed a total of 32,322 people. That figure excludes landslides triggered by earthquakes, and comes in at a little more than half the total number of people killed by floods, which claimed more than 7,600 lives annually between 1990 and 2006. Wildfires, by comparison, slayed 47 people per year, on average, between those dates. “These results are astounding in terms of the numbers of people dying from landslides,” says Rex Baum, a geologist with the US Geological Survey in Denver, Colorado. “This hasn’t been well documented on a global scale previously.” Petley reports that landslides tend to occur during the Northern Hemisphere summer and autumn, when monsoons strike eastern and southern Asia and hurricanes and typhoons slam Central America, islands of the Caribbean and land bordering the northwestern Pacific Ocean.

Fatality factors
In general, says Petley, fatalities happen where slopes are steep, there is plentiful rainfall for at least part of the year, and populations are dense. Although this combination of factors is unsurprising, it hasn’t previously been shown statistically, says Dalia Kirschbaum, a geoscientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland.

Despite the large numbers, the results are probably underestimates of long-term averages. Several regions purportedly prone to landslides, such as North Korea and Ethiopia, report few of the events that actually happen. Furthermore, many people who die from landslide-caused injuries long after the event itself are not included in final death tallies. And finally, the interval that Petley studied did not contain an extended El Niño — a climate pattern that usually increases the number of hurricanes striking the Caribbean and Central America, and can therefore dramatically boost occurrences of fatal landslides.

The data set doesn't cover enough years to be useful for making predictions, but it does hint that the frequency of landslides is rising.

“It’s certainly true that there are opportunities for future increases in fatalities,” says Baum. Populations in affected areas are growing and encroaching on deforested land that is prone to landslides. But without long-term data, he notes, it is hard to estimate just how high the death toll could mount.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on August 8, 2012.

Sid Perkins, who writes most often about Earth and planetary sciences, materials science and paleontology, is based in Crossville, Tenn.

More by Sid Perkins

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe