Decisions Relating to Patents

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


U. S. Circuit Court -- Eastern District of Wisconsion THE BUTZ THERMO-ELECTRIC REGULATOR COMPANY vs. THE JACOBS ELECTRIC COMPANY Jenkins, J. Letters patent No. 223,234, granted December 2, 1879, to Julien M. Bradford, for an improvement in electric -heat and vapor governors for spinning and weaving looms, sustained, and held infringed by a second circuit breaker operating on the same principle and performing the same functions by analogous means or . equivalent combinations, although the infringing machine may be an improvement on the patented invention and patentable as such. The mere change in form or an alteration in. unessential parts, or the use of known equivalent powers not varying essentially the machine or its mode of operation or organization, will not avail to avoid infringement. It constitutes an infringement to manufacture for the purpose of use, even if not actually used. A New Ruling Pen. An improved ruling pen, by Thomas Bennet, of Philadelphia, Pa., is made with one of - its blades movable when under the finger. The' pen may be set to make both light lines and heavy lines. If, in the progress of the work, heavy lines are needed, a pressure of the finger on the pen produces them. On releasing the finger, the pen returns to light lines.

SA Supplements Vol 27 Issue 680suppThis article was published with the title “Patents” in SA Supplements Vol. 27 No. 680supp (), p. 21
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican01121889-10870dsupp

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe