Detection of Cotton in Unbleached Linen

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A piece of the stuff to be examined is well washed with boiling water and dried, then laid in a mixture of 2 parts of dried nitrate of potash and 3 parts of ordinary sulphuric acid, and left in intimate contact with it for 8 or 10 minutes according to the strength of the labric. After a complete washing and drying, the piece of stuff which has been changed by the nitric acid is decocted with ether, to which some alcohol is added; the more consistent the collodion thus obtained, the more cotton was there in the linen. If no cotton be in it, the etherial deeoction is scarcely thickened. If it is wished to determine the quantity of cotton, it is only necessary to weigh the linen after it has been boiled with water and dried, then to proceed as above, separate the collodion obtained from the residue (which is unchanged linen), wash this well with some ether and alcohol, dry and weigh it; the loss of weight gives the quantity of cotton with tolerable accuracy.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 36This article was published with the title “Detection ot Cotton in Unbleached Linen” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 36 (), p. 281
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican05211853-281a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe