New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Disaster Program Allocates Unprecedented Funds for Climate Resilience

Communities will be able to tap into $500 million to mitigate against disasters by, for example, strengthening building codes

A woman walks through floodwaters on Ocean Boulevard August 3, 2020 in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency will reward states and communities that seek to address the effects of climate change under a new grant program that provides an unprecedented amount of money for resilience projects and planning.

FEMA announced last week that it will allocate $500 million next year through its Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program for mitigation efforts such as moving buildings out of floodplains and strengthening building codes.

"It's a huge increase of resources that FEMA has never had available to it before," said Rob Moore of the Natural Resources Defense Council.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The new program, known by its acronym BRIC, replaces FEMA's 23-year-old Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program, which has allocated an average of $100 million a year since 2003.

BRIC places an emphasis on addressing the effects of climate change; strengthening building codes; and using natural barriers such as wetlands, floodplains and reefs to build resilience to riverine flooding and sea-level rise.

The pre-disaster mitigation funding fell well short of the demand from states. Between 2003 and 2016, the program allocated $1.1 billion to states but received requests for projects totaling $3.2 billion, according to a FEMA report.

In the final years of the Obama administration, the program provided just $25 million a year. Annual funding in recent years increased to $250 million.

The additional money under BRIC comes as climate change is increasing the frequency and intensity of hurricanes, floods and wildfires, resulting in a growing number of major disasters in the United States.

"I can't think of another program right now that's putting up this much money to do mitigation, infrastructure and resiliency," said Amelia Muccio, director of mitigation at Hagerty Consulting Inc., an emergency management company. "I'm hoping that every year they're able to make an investment of this size, and as BRIC becomes more heavily funded, the overall spending on federal disasters goes down."

FEMA will allocate $446 million of the $500 million through a competitive process that evaluates funding proposals from states and municipalities on a variety of factors. The remaining $54 million will go to states, territories and American Indian tribes, with each entity receiving up to $600,000.

In evaluating state and municipal discretionary funding requests, FEMA will score each proposal on 14 factors that rate the potential effectiveness of a project and the applicant's previous work on resilience.

In a major shift from the old disaster mitigation program, FEMA will award points to projects that "anticipate future conditions" such as "climate changes, sea-level rise," and changes in population and demographics. The old program was silent on climate change.

"There's much more recognition of climate risks," Moore of NRDC said. "A lot of things are getting renewed emphasis."

The BRIC program makes other changes from its predecessor:

  • FEMA will award points to projects that use "nature-based solutions" — a concept that environmental groups have pushed for flood control as an alternative to levees and dikes. "Their point is to get away from gray infrastructure and to try to build some green infrastructure so you're not just surrounded by flood walls," said Muccio of Hagerty Consulting.

  • FEMA will award points to applicants that have adopted up-to-date construction codes, which require new buildings to be more resilient to damage from strong winds and flooding. FEMA has been urging states and municipalities to update their building codes, and has noted critically that many states continue to use outdated codes.

  • FEMA will provide individual grants up to $50 million — an increase from the previous $10 million limit, which some local officials said was inadequate to fund major projects that could substantially reduce a community's exposure to natural disasters.

"A lot of projects need to be done on the coastline, and they're expensive," Muccio said.

The BRIC program was authorized under a major federal disaster law enacted in October 2018 that aimed, among other things, to provide more federal money for mitigation and resilience projects.

The new law provides a steady stream of funding for the BRIC program by allowing FEMA to set aside for the program a small percentage of the money it spends on disaster recovery each year.

The old Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program had no guaranteed funding source and allocated only as much money as Congress and the White House approved each year. The sums fluctuated year to year.

"BRIC is not only a substantial increase in dollars that FEMA can distribute to state and local government, it also represents a stability of funding that has never existed," Moore said. "The old program has been on a yo-yo budgetwise since its inception."

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe