Disrupted Sleep Might Signal Early Stages of Alzheimer's

People who report sleeping restlessly, feeling tired during the day and taking sleep medication were more likely to be diagnosed with Alzheimer's within the next two years, a study finds

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Mo Costandi of Nature magazine

New Orleans, Louisiana—A disturbed night's sleep might signal a future diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, according to findings presented this week at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience in New Orleans, Louisiana.

Patients with Alzheimer’s often complain of changes in their sleep patterns during the early stages of the disease. In healthy people, for example, daytime naps usually last around 20 minutes, but they can be to 3 hours long in patients with Alzheimer’s disease.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Roxanne Sterniczuk, a neurophysiologist at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada, and her colleagues wanted to determine how early these changes occur and if they could predict a person’s future risk of developing the disease.

Sterniczuk and her colleagues analyzed data from around 14,600 healthy people, collected as part of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), a long-term observational study of people aged 50 and over from 12 European countries. They looked at various measures of sleep quality, and used them to produce a ‘sleep disturbance index’.

The researchers found that participants who reported sleeping restlessly, feeling tired during the day and taking sleep medication were more likely to be diagnosed with Alzheimer’s within the next 2 years, and that the greater the extent of these problems, the more severe were the symptoms of the subsequent disease.

“Increased daytime sleepiness was the biggest predictor,” says Sterniczuk. “It would appear that subtle changes in the sleep–wake cycle are taking place before any disease pathology.”

Early marker
Alzheimer’s disease is characterized by two hallmarks — the deposition of insoluble plaques made up of amyloid- ß protein, which accumulate in the spaces around nerve cells, and protein aggregates called neurofibrillary tangles that are deposited inside cells.

Sleep disturbances may be an early marker for the brain changes that occur as the disease develops, or they may contribute to progression of the disease, says David Holtzman, a neurologist at Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Missouri, who studies Alzheimer’s disease. “Either that pathology is beginning to occur during ageing, or sleep problems lead to accelerated Alzheimer’s pathology and disease,” he adds.

Last month, Holtzman and his colleagues reported that in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s the sleep–wake cycle breaks down following the formation of amyloid-ß plaques, and that eliminating the plaques caused the cycle to return to normal, suggesting that plaque formation causes the sleep disturbances. But he adds that distinguishing between the two possibilities in humans will require long-term studies to assess how biological markers associated with Alzheimer’s disease change through life.

Sterniczuk is now investigating whether the changes in sleep patterns are related to alterations in gene activity in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, a region of the brain that controls the circadian rhythm and regulates the sleep–wake cycle.

She emphasizes how important it is to find ways to accurately diagnose the condition and identify people at risk of developing it. “We have an ageing population on our hands, and there may be an Alzheimer’s pandemic in the next 10–15 years as the baby boomers reach the typical age of diagnosis,” she says.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on October 18, 2012.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe