New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

May 1, 2012

2 min read

Google Logo Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAm

Does Digital Piracy Really Hurt Movies?

Two economists untangle the relation between illegal downloads and ticket sales

By Michael Moyer

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The shadowy nature of illegal media down­loading makes it difficult for researchers to analyze the true relation between piracy and lost sales. Does every movie download represent a theater ticket left unpurchased, as the movie industry contends? Or are most downloaders people who never would have bought a ticket in the first place?

Two researchers have come up with a clever strategy to untangle one cause-and-effect re­lation. Economists Brett Danaher of Wellesley College and Joel Waldfogel of the University of Minnesota noticed that Hollywood studios often wait weeks after the U.S. premier before releasing a movie overseas. During that time, movie fans in foreign locales can find the film on BitTorrent-based file-sharing sites but not in their local theaters. If online piracy displaces ticket sales, these release lags should hurt a movie’s international box-office receipts.

The researchers compiled a database of the weekend box-office returns for the top 10 movies in 17 different countries over three years. They then split the data into two groups: movies re­leased before BitTorrent became popular and those released after. Controlling for everything else that might affect the returns for a movie, the researchers found that post-BitTorrent films made less money than pre-BitTorrent films. The longer the lag, the more they lost.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

More damning, the genres most popular with online pirates suffered the most. “After BitTorrent, the effect of release lag on science-fiction and action movies is much greater than it is for other genres,” Danaher says. He esti­mates that this type of piracy led to a $240-million annual drop in weekend box-office receipts in the 17 countries studied.

Of course, the study also proves a contention of piracy apologists: people turn to online piracy when that is the only way they can view the content. Danaher mentioned another episode from 2007, when NBC, in a contract dispute with Apple, suddenly pulled its content from the iTunes store. Traffic in pirated NBC content exploded. New laws may help steer people away from illegal downloads, but content providers need somewhere to steer them to.

This article was published in print as "Does Digital Piracy Really Hurt Movies?"

Rights & Permissions

Michael Moyer is the editor in charge of physics and space coverage at Scientific American. Previously he spent eight years at Popular Science magazine, where he was the articles editor. He was awarded the 2005 American Institute of Physics Science Writing Award for his article "Journey to the 10th Dimension," and has appeared on CBS, ABC, CNN, Fox and the Discovery Channel. He studied physics at the University of California at Berkeley and at Columbia University.

More by Michael Moyer
Scientific American Magazine Vol 306 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Does Digital Piracy Really Hurt Movies?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 306 No. 5 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican052012-33a1neDsBFEx9RcG2XybrT
View This Issue

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe