New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Duck-Billed Dinos Gave T. rex a Run for Its Money

Hadrosaurs could outrun tyrannosaurusesbecause of the layout of the herbivores’ tail muscles

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Pity the hadrosaur. The duck-billed dinosaur had no horns, armor or tusks for defense when Tyrannosaurus rex was on the hunt. And it was too big to escape by climbing a tree or burrowing into the ground. To top it all off, the herbivore was slow of foot. Luckily, the layout of a hadrosaur's leg and tail muscles may have helped it escape the massive jaws of tyrannosaur predators.

T. rex would win in a sprint, but a hadrosaur would outrun it in a longer race, paleontologist W. Scott Persons argues in a study about the dinosaurs' caudofemoralis muscles, published in November 2014 by Indiana University Press. The left and right caudofemoralis of theropod dinosaurs were large tail muscles anchored to the upper leg bones. Contractions would swing a hind limb backward, propelling the dinosaur forward. T. rex fossil impressions show that its caudofemoralis muscles were attached to the femur near the hip socket. Extrapolating from 3-D computer modeling of modern-day reptiles “means the physical distance the muscle has to contract to swing the leg through a single arc is very, very short,” Persons says. Short contractions allowed it to take fast, long strides.

In contrast, the hadrosaur's similarly sized caudofemoralis muscle was attached much farther down on the femur, making the muscle contraction considerably longer, which in turn made its strides shorter and slower. Advantage: T. rex.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


An extended race, however, would yield a different result. The proximity of T. rex's caudofemoralis muscle to its femur also meant the carnivore had to expend enormous amounts of energy to swing its leg, so it tired quickly. (Imagine the effort required to open and close a door if the doorknob were positioned three inches from the hinge.) For the hadrosaur, superior leverage and slower muscle contractions would mean that it tired less over great distances.

Thus, the only chance T. rex had to nab a hadrosaur was to take it by surprise, Persons notes. But unlike a big, agile cat, which can slink through high grass to sneak up on its prey, T. rex's size would have easily given it away. With a head start and the push of its leveraged legs, the duck-billed dino would live to run another day.

David Godkin is an award-winning science writer and frequent contributor to Scientific American and science-based biomedical engineering publications. He lives and works in Toronto.

More by David Godkin
Scientific American Magazine Vol 312 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Hadrosaur Gave T. rex a Run for Its Money” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 312 No. 2 (), p. 19
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0215-19

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe