On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
For many years, the U.S. measured literacy simply by asking respondents whether they could read or write, an approach perhaps sufficiently adequate when most people worked with their hands. Using this method, the Census Bureau in 1969 estimated that illiteracy in the U.S. population age 14 and older was only 1 percent.
In 1992 the U.S. Department of Education embarked on a more thorough analysis and mounted a landmark survey. It asked a representative group of 26,091 Americans to read several texts and then had them demonstrate that they understood the texts. The department used three types--prose, document and quantitative texts--containing fairly simple material encountered in everyday life. The study was repeated in 2003.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
