New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Shifty Sightings: Hubble Images Reveal 7 of the Most Distant Galaxies Ever Seen

The latest finds from Hubble date to just a few hundred million years after the big bang

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The title of most distant known galaxy has bounced around a bit in the past few years, as various teams of researchers have laid claim to progressively more remote objects in the early universe. Now a group of astronomers using the Hubble Space Telescope has tentatively identified a new record-holder: a galaxy so distant that its light has taken most of the 13.7-billion-year history of the universe to reach humankind’s telescopes.

By peering back to a time a few hundred million years after the big bang, Hubble spotted the galaxy, known as UDFj-39546284, which appears as little more than a faint smudge of infrared light. The galaxy has already had one turn as the most distant known galaxy—it was previously identified by a different group of astronomers using Hubble imagery but was later supplanted by a more recent, seemingly more distant discovery. The new data, however, suggest that UDFj-39546284 lies at redshift 11.9, corresponding to 380 million years after the big bang. That is even more distant than had been believed, leapfrogging the ancient galaxy back into the top spot. (Redshift, which quantifies how much an object’s emitted light wavelength has been stretched toward the red end of the spectrum in an expanding universe, is the astronomer’s preferred distance measure for faraway objects.)

More important to cosmologists, however, the new researchers identified not just one but seven objects that are most likely distant galaxies, all of which lie at redshift 8.5 or greater—that is, within 600 million years of the big bang. The results of the cosmic census may help researchers determine exactly what happened in the first billion years of cosmic history, when ultraviolet light from the earliest stars and galaxies ionized the hydrogen of the once-opaque intergalactic medium. The epoch of re-ionization, as it is known, effectively lifted a pervasive cosmic fog and left the universe in the transparent state that today allows us to observe objects billions of light-years away.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Of course the most distant object is interesting,” Richard Ellis of the California Institute of Technology, lead author of a study to be published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, said in a December 12 teleconference about the findings. “But it’s the census, it’s the seven objects, that give us the first indication of the population of objects in the heart of this re-ionization era.”

In conjunction with studies of galaxies a few hundred million years later, the new observations offer clues to the pace of re-ionization. “In our article we describe a very smooth decline in the number of objects as we probe back into cosmic history, into this re-ionization era,” he said. “Re-ionization is an extended process. It’s associated with gradual galaxy growth.”

But re-ionization probably began some 200 million years before the earliest galaxies Hubble has discovered. So the beginning of the story may have to wait for Hubble’s successor, set to launch in 2018. “This may well be as deep as Hubble can look into the re-ionization era,” Ellis noted. “But we confidently predict that there will be many galaxies beyond this into the re-ionization era that can be explored with the James Webb Space Telescope.”

Said NASA science chief, John Grunsfeld, who as an astronaut helped repair and upgrade Hubble for the last time in 2009, “We really are pushing Hubble well beyond what it was ever imagined it would do.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe