New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Editor's Letter: Why We Love Illusions

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one. —Albert Einstein

What we experience shapes our reality. “Seeing is believing,” right? Not necessarily. Visual illusions can distort our perception so that what we “see” does not correspond with what is physically there. This special edition of Scientific American Mind explores the world of sensory illusions and delves into how they fool the brain.

The word “illusion” derives from the Latin illudere, “to mock,” whereas the word itself has roots in 14th-century Anglo-French, meaning an act of deception. That's because our brain—not our eyes—is the final arbiter of “truth.” We are wired to analyze the constant flood of information from our senses and organize that input into a rational interpretation of our world. Much of the time our brain decodes those signals correctly. But illusions derail the process—although our sensations may seem to be accurate, our perceptions are not. Some illusory adaptations help us to survive, such as being able to recognize the same object outside in bright sun or in a dimly lit room, despite the difference in brilliance or wavelength of the light source. Others just trick us. Illusions are both intriguing and fun; our deep fascination with them dates back to the ancient Greeks. For the past century, however, they have also played an important role in brain research.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Illusions help neuroscientists unravel the mysteries of how the human brain creates “reality.” In the introduction to this special issue, Susana Martinez-Conde and Stephen L. Macknik write, “It is a fact of neuroscience that everything we experience is a figment of our imagination.” Understanding how the brain “misperceives” sensory input and influences perception is at the heart of their research as professors of ophthalmology at SUNY Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, N.Y. In the articles that fill these pages, Martinez-Conde and Macknik will show you how your brain constructs 3-D images, how context can alter the way you gauge size and perceive color, perspective or pain—and share illusions that make objects appear, disappear or move.

If you want more eye candy, click through the past winners of the Best Illusion of the Year Contest (illusionoftheyear.com). And don't forget to notice the biggest illusion of all: the world around you.

SA Special Editions Vol 25 Issue 3sThis article was published with the title “Is Seeing Believing?” in SA Special Editions Vol. 25 No. 3s (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanillusions0816-1

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe