New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Electric Car Advocates Want to Expand Access to Low-Income Communities

Those most impacted by air pollution should be able to more easily use cleaner vehicles, environmentalists argue

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Advocates of electric cars want to tear down barriers that make the vehicles less accessible to some drivers — including those in communities hit hardest by air pollution.

Disadvantaged populations, including low-income communities, have unequal access to the technology, according to a new report from the Sierra Club and Plug in America, a nonprofit group that promotes electric vehicles.

For one thing, low-income drivers often live in multi-unit dwellings, whose building codes would need to be updated to accommodate EV charging spaces. And they’re often unable to take advantage of the federal tax credit that provides an incentive for EV adoption, the groups say.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Though EV deployment has increased in recent years, people from disadvantaged communities are more likely to encounter the strongest barriers to EV adoption,” the report says. “Additionally, most low-income folks will not be able to access the $7,500 credit given that they won’t have the tax liability. They can access it if they lease, but it’s not always guaranteed that the financing company will pass on the savings to the consumer.”

The report aims to spread awareness of the disparities, crossing into territory that few advocates of the technology have dared to enter.

Mary Lunetta, campaign representative for the Sierra Club’s Electric Vehicles Initiative, said she felt it was important to include the paragraph about the federal credit, despite hesitance among some advocates.

“In this industry, we never want to talk down about the credit,” Lunetta said. “But it’s important to recognize that it doesn’t serve all people all the time.”

Lunetta says it all comes down to environmental justice.

“Communities of color are disproportionately impacted by the air pollution of transportation. And it’s because they’re often located along really busy and smoggy freeways or major hubs,” she said. “As an industry, the clean transportation movement could do far more to understand who is pushed to the margins of the issue.”

The report also highlights state-level initiatives to broaden access to EVs, including San Diego Gas & Electric Co.’s Power Your Drive program, which is deploying around 3,000 charging stations at workplaces, at multi-unit dwellings and in disadvantaged communities.

Helen Gao, a spokeswoman for SDG&E, said she was pleased to see the initiative highlighted in the report.

“When the program was approved, SDG&E was committed to putting at least 10 percent of the chargers in disadvantaged communities,” Gao said. “Currently, we’re at 35 percent. So we’re far exceeding our goal.”

The effort is particularly important given that transportation is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in California, clocking in at 39 percent, she added.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe