New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Elephant Seals Reveal Anti-Inflammatory Secrets of Carbon Monoxide

The gas appears to protect the deep-diving seals from cell damage after periods of restricted blood flow

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Blood samples from elephant seals may help to explain how carbon monoxide — a poison — can stop inflammation, researchers have found.The seals routinely dive to depths of 500 meters and stay underwater for 25 minutes at a time, surfacing for just a few minutes between plunges. During these forays, blood flow to nonessential tissues and organs is restricted, but the tissues are not damaged. Researchers at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego, California, suggest that high levels of carbon monoxide in the seals' blood has a protective effect — echoing laboratory research on rats and mice that has found the gas has anti-inflammatory properties and can lead to better outcomes after organ transplant.

This unusual physiology was first observed in the mid-1950s by Lewis Pugh of the National Institute for Medical Research in London. Pugh monitored carbon monoxide levels in the blood of the men living in an Antarctic base to ensure that their stoves were not poisoning them. While there, Pugh also found surprisingly high carbon monoxide concentrations in the blood of Weddell seals killed to feed sled dogs.

In the 1960s, researchers discovered that mammals produce carbon monoxide when haemoglobin and myoglobin proteins in their cells degrade. Decades later, in the early 1990s, scientists realized that the gas — previously thought of only as a toxin — can be therapeutic at some concentrations. Experiments in animals including rats and mice have shown that inhaling carbon monoxide improves outcomes after organ transplants and heart attacks, and carbon monoxide treatments for organ transplants are beginning human clinical trials. Yet the mechanism behind the gas's benefits remains unknown.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Now, in research presented this week at the Experimental Biology 2014 meeting in San Diego, California, seals return to the picture.

When Michael Tift, a comparative physiologist at Scripps, analysed blood samples from 24 elephant seals on a California beach, he found high levels of haemoglobin. In adult seals, up to 10% of that haemoglobin was bound to carbon monoxide, implying high levels of carbon monoxide in the blood.

The levels of carbon monoxide in the seals' blood was comparable to that of “someone who is smoking more than 40 cigarettes a day,” Tift says. In nonsmoking humans, just 1–1.5% of haemoglobin is bound to carbon monoxide.

Tift thinks that the seals’ carbon monoxide levels and the gas’s therapeutic benefits in medical studies have a common explanation. Just as elephant seals restrict blood flow to their nonessential tissues during deep dives, blood flow is interrupted in humans during organ transplantation, stroke, heart attack and other injuries. In humans, when oxygen-rich blood floods back into tissues, it prompts an onslaught of chemical reactions that cause inflammation, cell death and even tissue necrosis. The seals have none of these effects.

“These animals are constantly holding their breath,” Tift says, “but they don’t have any injuries.” He proposes that elevated carbon monoxide may prevent damage from the returning blood flow.

“Carbon monoxide seems to slow the metabolism of the tissue,” says Leo Otterbein, a physiologist at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts, who pioneered therapeutic uses of carbon monoxide. Slowing metabolism — and thus oxygen use — would delay or eliminate the formation of molecules that cause inflammation and cell death, he says.

The seals may provide a useful system to better understand how carbon monoxide works in the body to prevent problems, says Roberto Motterlini, a vascular biologist at the French medical research agency (INSERM) in Paris. Carbon monoxide may stimulate mitochondria production, he notes, something researchers could test in elephant seals.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on April 30, 2014.

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe