Employers and Workmen

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A bill was recently introduced into the British Parliament, having for its object the settlement and prevention of disputes betwQen employers and their workmen. When the second reading of it was called for by Mr. McKinnon, the Home Secretary—Mr. Walpole hoped it would not be pressed during the present sessjon, as the bill was very defective, especially that part of it which related to the formation of a court of arbitration. Mr. A. Turner, a large employer, objected to the principles of the bill, and asserted it would do evil instead of good. He said that of late years, a growing feeling of amity had sprung up between employers and employed, and the b}ll would arrest this feeling. The people were becoming far too sensible to enter recklessly into strikes against their employers, and on the other hand employers were anxious to do all in their power to avoid disputes with their workmen. They had all united interests, and should have but one wish for the common good. The bill was then withdrawn. These sentiments, expressed in Parliament, exhibit cheerful signs of progress in Old England.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 42This article was published with the title “Employers and Workmen” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 42 (), p. 334
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican06261858-334d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe