New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

‘Like knives inside my body’: Endometriosis is hard to diagnose, but a new ultrasound simulator could help doctors better recognize the condition

A company that makes surgical simulators released a tool to train clinicians to diagnose a deep form of endometriosis

cropped image of young woman holding her stomach

LaylaBird/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

“To me it was like knives inside my body—like someone stabbing me from the inside.”* That’s how Noémie Elhadad describes the pain of endometriosis, a condition she has lived with since she was a teenager. Now an associate professor of biomedical informatics at Columbia University, Elhadad is far from alone. Endometriosis—a condition in which the tissue lining the uterus grows outside of it—affects an estimated 10 percent of people with uteruses of reproductive age worldwide. Its symptoms include severe pelvic pain, infertility and pain during sex.

It often takes years for people to get a diagnosis, if ever, and there are few treatments available apart from menstruation suppression, pain management and surgery. Elhadad studies AI and medicine and has developed an app that surveys people with endometriosis about their symptoms. She says that in her experience, “there have been episodes where I nearly felt I was dying.”

Now Swedish company Surgical Science has developed a device designed to better train clinicians to recognize signs of the disease using ultrasound. Making endometriosis diagnosis more accessible could lead to earlier treatment, says Katie Jenner, senior director of the product management team for Surgical Science’s endometriosis simulator, whose new module was announced today.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“We are on a mission to democratize ultrasound education and training,” she says.

Historically, the gold standard for diagnosing endometriosis has been surgery, through small cuts made in the abdomen. But surgery is still invasive and inaccessible to some patients, and many clinicians instead rely on symptoms alone to make a diagnosis. And while some have turned to noninvasive imaging methods such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transvaginal ultrasound very few doctors receive enough training in how to use ultrasound to diagnose endometriosis. Surgical Science’s endometriosis ultrasound simulator aims to change that.

Part of why it is so hard to diagnose endometriosis using imaging has to do with how the disease manifests. There are three main types of endometriosis. Ovarian endometriomas, also called “chocolate cysts,” are benign blood-filled cysts on the ovaries that are fairly easy to detect on an ultrasound. Deep endometriosis is a more aggressive form in which endometrial tissue invades other organs, such as the bowel and bladder; it’s detectable on an ultrasound, but most gynecologists and surgeons aren’t trained to do that. Superficial endometriosis, meanwhile, is the most common form of the disease and also the hardest to detect. It causes shallow lesions on the membrane that lines the abdominal cavity that are hard to see on ultrasound or MRI.

A screenshot of an image from Surgical Science's Ultrasound Mentor product showing uterine features and a graphical illustration of a female pelvis

An image from Surgical Science's Ultrasound Mentor product showing Endometrioma and Posterior Uterine Fibroids with labels.

Surgical Science

Surgical Science’s new simulator module incorporates a feature known as the “sliding sign,” which can help better diagnose deep endometriosis. Deep endometriosis causes adhesions, or areas of scar tissue, in organs around the uterus. If pressure from the ultrasound wand causes organs in this area to glide smoothly, that suggests there are no adhesions. But if there is stiff tissue, that can indicate adhesions—and the presence of endometriosis.

According to surveys at workshops in which Surgical Science’s simulator was used, 92 percent of clinicians reported improved understanding of endometriosis diagnosis. And there was a 150 percent increase in confidence in identifying deep endometriosis.

“Better training means faster, more reliable detection,” said Surgical Science CEO Tom Englund in a statement shared with Scientific American.

Currently, the simulator cannot train clinicians to diagnose superficial endometriosis. And ultrasound still lacks the resolution that MRI or surgery can provide. But it’s a step in the right direction, Elhadad says. After all, people with endometriosis often have their pain dismissed or normalized.

“Having access to the diagnosis gives you access to early interventions,” she says. “And I think that’s a very useful thing.”

*Editor's Note (3/12/26): This sentence was edited to correct a typo in Elhadad's quote.

Tanya Lewis was formerly senior desk editor for health and medicine at Scientific American. She wrote and edited stories for the website and print magazine on topics ranging from COVID to organ transplants. She also appeared on Scientific American’s podcast Science Quickly and wrote Scientific American’s weekly Health & Medicine newsletter. She held a number of positions over her nearly 10 years at Scientific American, including health editor, assistant news editor and associate editor at Scientific American Mind. Previously, she has written for outlets that include Insider, Wired, Science News and others. She has a degree in biomedical engineering from Brown University and one in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz. Follow her on Bluesky @tanyalewis.bsky.social

More by Tanya Lewis

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe