English and American Clipper Ships

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The English clipper-ship " Australia," recently returned to Liverpool after a quick run, and in portions of her log, which were published, the statement was made that the " Australia " had passed at different periods of her voyage the American clippers " Fly ing Cloud," " White Squall," and " Atalanta." Lieutenant Maury, whose attention was called to this statement, examined into the matter, and from a comparison of the logs of these vessels conclusively shows that at thetime the " Australia " is said to have passed the " White Squall," that vessel was one hundred miles distant, laying to, for the repair of damages to spars, and that at the time the " Flying Cloud " is said to have been passed she was two thousand miles distant from the "Australia." He therefore concludes that it was some other ships, and not the two American clippers, that the " Australia " " passed with ease." In regard to the " Atalanta," Lieut. Maury could say nothing, as he was not furnished with an abstract of her log.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 48This article was published with the title “English and American Clipper Ships” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 48 (), p. 378
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican08131853-378e

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe