New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

EU to Ban Fish from Sri Lanka

The European Commission proposed a ban on imports of fish from Sri Lanka for not tackling illegal fishing properly and lifted a ban on fish imports from Belize following the reform of its vessel inspection practices.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Julia Fioretti

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The European Commission proposed a ban on imports of fish from Sri Lanka for not tackling illegal fishing properly and lifted a ban on fish imports from Belize following the reform of its vessel inspection practices.

The Commission on Tuesday also lifted warnings on Fiji, Panama, Togo and Vanuatu, saying they had implemented concrete measures to combat illegal fishing.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The four countries thus avoided being placed on the "red list" of nations that are not allowed to sell fish to the 28-nation European Union, the world's biggest fish importer.

"Our policy of resolute cooperation is yielding results," EU Maritime Affairs Commissioner Maria Damanaki said in a statement.

"Five countries receive today our appreciation for getting serious on illegal fishing. Unfortunately, I cannot say the same for Sri Lanka."

Since 2010 the EU has taken action against countries that do not follow international standards to prevent over-fishing, such as policing their waters for unlicensed fishing vessels and imposing sanctions to ensure adherence to rules against illegal fishing.

Damanaki said Sri Lanka did not even have proper legislation in place to prevent and fight illegal fishing, which led the Commission to put forward the import ban.

The proposal from the Commission, the EU's executive, to ban fish imports from Sri Lanka will be discussed by EU member states before the end of the year and if agreed will take effect from mid-January 2015.

The states will also have to sign off on the lifting of the ban on Belize and of the warnings on Fiji, Panama, Togo and Vanuatu.

EU fishing vessels will not be able to operate in Sri Lanka's coastal waters if the import ban takes effect in 2015.

Sri Lanka is one of the biggest exporters to the European Union of high value fishery products such as swordfish and tuna. EU imports in 2013 amounted to 7,400 tonnes of fish worth 74 million euros ($94 million), according to the Commission.

The three months before the import ban comes into effect will also allow Sri Lanka to address the EU's concerns by, for example, implementing international maritime law obligations and putting in place an efficient vessel monitoring system and a sanction scheme for high seas fleets, the Commission said.

The bloc has banned fish imports from Cambodia and Guinea over illegal fishing since March, and it delivered a formal warning to the Philippines and Papua New Guinea in June. A review of these countries' progress in tackling illegal fishing is expected in January next year.

Campaign groups such as the Environmental Justice Foundation, Oceana, the Pew Charitable Trusts and WWF welcomed the Commission's announcement for continuing the fight against illegal fishing.

Fish caught illegally are worth up to 10 billion euros a year, according to the Commission.

 

(editing by Jane Baird)

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe