Extension of a Patent

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On the petition of J. Augustus Roth, of Fairmount, Philadelphia Co., Pa,, praying for the extension of a patent granted to him on the 31st of Oct., 1839, for an improvement in furnaces for smelting ores, for seven years from the expiration of said patent, which takes place Oct. 31st, 1853. It is ordered that the said petition be heard at the Patent Office on Monday, the 3rd of Oct., 1853, at 12 oclock M. ; and all persons are notified to appear and show cause, if any they have, why said petition ought not to be granted. Persons opposing the extension are required to file in the Patent Office their objections specifically set forth in writing, at least twenty days before the day of hearing ; all testimony filed by either party to be used at the said hearing must be taken and transmitted in accordance with the rules of the office, which which will be furnished on application. S. H. HODGES, Com. of Pat. Washington, March 2, 1853.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 26This article was published with the title “Extension of a Patent” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 26 (), p. 206
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican03121853-206

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe