Fast-Mutating Viruses Point Back to Criminal Spreaders of Disease

Forensic epidemiologists are tracking rapid viral mutations to help convict criminal spreaders of disease

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In May 2012 a hospital in small-town Exeter, N.H., notified the state of a possible cluster of linked hepatitis C cases. Four people had recently been diagnosed, and testing soon revealed that the genetic codes of the strains that they carried were nearly identical. Because hepatitis C virus (HCV) mutates rapidly, epidemiologist Jose Montero knew that the infections most likely originated from the same person. “We knew we needed to find this person immediately,” says Montero, the state's director of public health.

The four also shared a common history—three had been patients at Exeter Hospital's Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, and one worked there. As the investigators began testing former laboratory patients, they identified 29 more cases. By sequencing the genomes of the viruses in the outbreak, Montero's colleagues at the state's Public Health Laboratories constructed an evolutionary tree that led back to lab employee David Kwiatkowski. Police believe Kwiatkowski injected himself with the clinic's narcotics and reused the needles on patients.

More and more, scientists are helping to solve crimes using molecular techniques originally designed for epidemiology—tracking the spread of disease through large populations. In a similar application of forensic epidemiology, Fernando González Candelas of the University of Valencia helped to retrace an even larger outbreak in Spain, where an anesthesiologist was suspected of spreading HCV to hundreds of patients.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Candelas's group compared the genomes of viruses contracted in the outbreak with those of other HCV strains circulating in Valencia. The researchers found that people sickened in the outbreak carried a virus that was significantly closer to the anesthesiologist's strain of HCV than anything going around in the community, indicating that the doctor had almost certainly infected them. Candelas and his colleagues were also able to estimate when a person became infected to confirm that the infection occurred while that person was under the doctor's care.

The researchers recently published in BMC Biology the details of their inquiry, which in 2007 helped to convict the anesthesiologist of infecting 275 people. “People can live with HCV for a long time and infect large numbers of people,” Candelas says. “The only way we can prove that they are the source of the infections is through forensic epidemiology.”

Despite the widening use of epidemiology in the courtroom, it has its limitations. In one critique, two researchers noted that viral reconstructions involve a degree of interpretation and estimation. They cautioned that jurors may place unwarranted confidence in the science “and fail to comprehend or fully engage with its complexities and inherent shortcomings.”

The New Hampshire hepatitis case never reached a jury. After Montero worked with the fbi to build a criminal case that uncovered a trail of HCV infections and drug infractions across several states, Kwiatkowski pled guilty in August. Although Montero cannot say with certainty why Kwiatkowski accepted a plea deal, “I'd like to believe it was on the strength of our epidemiological investigation.”

Carrie Arnold is an independent public health journalist in Virginia.

More by Carrie Arnold
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Mutating Viruses Lead Cops to the Criminals” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 5 (), p. 22
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1113-22a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe