New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Feds Crush Six Tons of Ivory to Save Elephants

Why the U.S. destroyed a multimillion-dollar stockpile of illegal ivory

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On a clear November day outside Denver, dust filled the air as an industrial rock crusher pulverized nearly six tons of confiscated elephant ivory. Loader trucks dumped batch after batch of whole tusks, carved figurines, bracelets and other baubles into the giant blue crusher, which spat out a stream of fragments that looked like bits of seashell.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service destroyed the 25-year stash of ivory seizures—worth perhaps $12 million on the black market—to signal to the world that the U.S. will not tolerate elephant poaching or wildlife crime in general. Even though international commercial trade in ivory has been outlawed since 1989, poachers continue to kill African elephants for their tusks—one every 15 minutes. At that rate, the animals could be extinct in the wild within decades.

Authorities are concerned not just with the volume of the ivory trade but with whom is doing the killing. Today's poaching crisis is the work of transnational criminal syndicates that traffic in wildlife just as they traffic in humans, drugs and arms. Profits from the illegal sale of ivory, rhinoceros horn and other wildlife products—a $19-billion-a-year industry—are now known to fund terrorist and other extremist groups. The countries that harbor wild elephants rarely have the resources to counter such foes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Whether the destruction of ivory stockpiles will actually help stamp out the trade is a matter of some debate. Critics contend that by reducing the ivory supply, such actions may drive up the price and thus stimulate even more poaching.

Yet past attempts to do the opposite by flooding the market with ivory have backfired and driven more poaching, says Peter Knights of WildAid, a nongovernmental organization based in San Francisco. “I think we have to look at history, and we have to learn this lesson,” Knights asserts, likening criminal wildlife trafficking to the drug trade. “We don't put heroin back on the market when we seize it”.

Travel expenses to attend the ivory crush were paid in part by the International Fund for Animal Welfare and the World Wildlife Fund.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong
Scientific American Magazine Vol 310 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Tusk to Dust” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 310 No. 2 (), p. 18
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0214-18

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe