Feeding Bees

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Put a pound ol brown sugar in a low tin dish, wet it with water, and lay a number of small strips of wood across for the bees to rest on while at work. One pound ot six-cent sugar produces two pounds of honey.” Our neighbor of the Scientific American must revise his chemistry. How a pound of food can become two pounds of secretion, besides supporting the animals, it is beyond our reach to discover. We have seen the same statement before and commented on it in our last number. [The Plow, Loom, and Anvil. [Our neighbor must revise Ids chemistry. How can a stalk of corn produce more weight of fruit than the guano applied to manure it ' The question is not how much honey is produced from a pound of food, hut a pound of sugar. Does not honey contain more moisture than sugar. Let our neighbor put 20 pounds of honey in a sugar evaporating pan and expel all the moisture, and then weigh the product and see if he gets any more than 10 pounds of a gummy sugar. Benjamin Loder, Esq., the well-known head ol the Erie Railroad Company, has resigned his trust into the har.ds of the Board ot Directors, owing to continued weak health.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 40This article was published with the title “Feeding Bees” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 40 (), p. 313
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican06181853-313a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe