New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Fickle Fairies: A Biologist Discusses Promiscuous Birds and Human Evolution

A biologist on lusty birds and human evolution

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

PROFILE

NAMES
Mike Webster

TITLE
Evolutionary biologist


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


LOCATION
Cornell Lab of Ornithology Ithaca, N.Y.

Red-backed fairy-wrens are an Australian species of small insectivorous birds. Males and females are socially monogamous—they pair together and stay in a family group. But they are also sexually promiscuous, so a lot of the offspring aren't sired by the male that is raising them at the nest.

When you have all this extra pair mating, there is a lot of competition among the males for females. Sexual competition of this kind can shape sexual signals like plumage, and so it can be an important driver of speciation events. This sort of sexual selection is thought to have been key in human evolution.

In the birds we study, there are two types of males: brightly colored red-and-black ones and drab brown ones. Hormones regulate which path they go on, and social interactions during the prebreeding season appear to regulate hormones. In a relatively high-ranking male, testosterone goes up, and he develops into a bright guy. But if he gets negative social feedback—like receiving little interest from females or aggression from other males—his testosterone goes down, and he develops into a drab guy. The red-and-black males sire a lot more young, and becoming brown makes the best of a bad situation. They are unlikely to be breeders, so they save whatever costs there are of having a bright breeding phenotype. But the plumage change is not permanent. They just wait for another year or two until they are in better condition and then breed as bright males.

Many earlier, simple models in evolution didn't take into account the idea of phenotypic plasticity, such as these temporary plumage changes. We are interested in understanding what the consequences of that plasticity are.

Library Catalogues Animal Sound Diversity: The Macaulay Sound Library at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology in Ithaca, N.Y. holds the oldest and largest collection of animal sounds in the world. The collection helps scientists understand the screeches, calls, buzzes and songs of life.

About Marissa Fessenden

Marissa is a freelance science journalist in Bozeman, Montana. She was an editorial intern with Scientific American from June 2012 through June 2013. Follow on Twitter @marisfessenden

More by Marissa Fessenden
Scientific American Magazine Vol 307 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Fickle Fairies” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 307 No. 5 (), p. 26
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1112-26a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe