New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

First-Ever Puppies Born via IVF

Test-tube procedure may one day be applied to endangered species

RosetteJordaan ©iStock.com

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Joseph Ax

NEW YORK, Dec 9 (Reuters) - Rarely is a major scientific breakthrough so darn cute.

Researchers at Cornell University in New York State and the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C., announced on Wednesday the first litter of puppies born through in vitro fertilization.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The seven puppies were born on July 10 and include five beagles and two beagle-cocker spaniel mixes. The results were published on Wednesday in the science journal PLOS ONE.

The process of in vitro fertilization, in which eggs are fertilized with sperm outside the body before the embryos are implanted into a female, has been in use since the 1970s to assist in human birth.

But scientists have long struggled to reproduce those results with dogs, in part because the canine reproductive cycle differs from that of other mammals.

"Since the mid-1970s, people have been trying to do in a dog and have been unsuccessful," said one of the authors, Alex Travis, the head of the laboratory at Cornell's Baker Institute for Animal Health.

Female dogs only ovulate once or twice a year, and their eggs tend to be less mature at that stage, according to the research paper.

The scientists built upon an earlier success. In 2012, Travis' laboratory was able to produce Klondike, the first puppy in the Western Hemisphere to be born from a frozen embryo.

The technique could eventually be used to help breed endangered species in captivity, Travis said, for example the African painted dog.

He also said the development opens the door to detecting genetic traits that lead to disease and fixing them preemptively.

"Instead of trying to cure disease, we can help prevent it from happening in the first place," he said.

The paper, whose lead author was Jennifer Nagashima, a postdoctoral fellow at the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, said the research could shed light on the genetic basis for numerous disorders that affect both dogs and humans.

Dogs share more than 350 similar heritable disorders and traits with humans, almost twice as many as any other species, according to the paper. (Reporting by Joseph Ax; Editing by David Gregorio)

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe