New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Flat Earthers Are Flat Wrong

Those who doubt the planet is spherical often wind up subscribing to a host of other nonsensical notions

Matt Collins

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On February 22 “Mad” Mike Hughes died when his self-built steam rocket crashed shortly after takeoff. Hughes was a famous flat-earther, one of a growing group who do not accept that Earth is an oblate spheroid (which it is). His fatal launch was apparently general daredevilry and not an attempt to gather data for flatearthism. Although coverage by our friends at Space.com quoted him as saying in a 2017 documentary, “I'm going to build my own rocket right here, and I'm going to see it with my own eyes what shape this world we live on.”

Either way, Hughes's demise put flat-earth belief in the news briefly, which got me to dig out an interview I did last year with Michael Marshall, project director of the Good Thinking Society. The U.K. society has taken on the Sisyphean task of “encouraging curious minds and promoting rational inquiry.” And Marshall has become well versed in why on Earth people would believe it's flat.

“Some do believe it's a disk,” Marshall said. “But there's more than one way to think it's flat … some people believe that Earth is actually an infinite plane in all directions … and so when I first came across the flat-earth movement in 2013, this was quite a vociferous debate.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


While those factions fought at conferences, other attendees were actually round-earth accepters who thought it would be fun to mix it up with the flat-earthers. Turned out it wasn't.

“And so they were stomping into these arguments, saying, well, what about photos of Earth from space and what about ships going over the horizon,” Marshall said, “not realizing that those were the first things [flat-earthers] thought about.” And they had convincing, if incorrect, responses. “And so [the flat-earthers] were winning those arguments … and in winning those arguments, they were converting even more people.”

Then, in 2016, some YouTube videos threw gasoline on the two-dimensional fire. Marshall said the video content was straightforward: “Proof number one: the horizon looks flat. Proof number two: even if you go up a mountain, the horizon looks flat. Proof number three: water can't stick to a curved surface. It always goes level, so there's no way it could stick to a ball. They're all very simplistic arguments.”

YouTube's recommendation algorithm appears to have then amplified the signal by bringing flatearth info to the attention of fans of other questionable notions. “So you'd be watching a video about moon-landing denial,” Marshall explained, “and YouTube would say, 'I think someone who's a bit into moon-landing denial might also be into the flat-earth theory.' And it would float it there as a suggestion. And if people clicked it, that solidified that link.” Flat-earth belief, quirky and perhaps humorous on its own, thus became part of what Marshall called “an ecosystem of conspiracy theory.”

“One thing that really surprised me at a convention I went to,” Marshall said, “was how little material was about the flat earth.” For example, he saw a presentation by a conspiracy theorist about the New World Order and the Illuminati. “But he was also pointing out how dinosaurs were faked.” The presenter tapped into the mother lode of conspiracy thinking by recommending a virulently anti-Semitic book that allegedly reveals what's really going on behind the scenes. Which reminds me, I have to wrap this column up so I can get to the Secret Jewish Cabal That Runs the Global Media meeting. (George Soros is serving hamantaschen!)

Not surprisingly, antivaccine material and other terrible health information are also passed around in conjunction with flat-earth ideas. Marshall recalled a convention speaker telling the assembled that “you can cure all manner of diseases, including HIV and AIDS, by drinking or injecting your own urine.” I would have thought that even someone who didn't know that Greek mathematician Eratosthenes nicely estimated Earth's circumference more than 2,000 years ago-proving that the planet was round-would consider urine injection to be a piss-poor idea.

Steve Mirsky was the winner of a Twist contest in 1962, for which he received three crayons and three pieces of construction paper. It remains his most prestigious award.

More by Steve Mirsky
Scientific American Magazine Vol 322 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Flat Wrong” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 322 No. 5 (), p. 72
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0520-72

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe