New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Could This Fossil Be the Key Linking Humans, Neandertals and Denisovans?

Fossils of a human ancestor from 773,000 years ago may be near the base of the Homo sapiens lineage, representing a common ancestor of modern humans, Neandertals and Denisovans

Profile view of a white mandible with teeth against a black background

A mandible from the newly discovered ancient human ancestor.

Hamza Mehimdate, Programme Préhistoire de Casablanca

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A trio of jawbones, a leg bone, and a handful of vertebrae and teeth found in Morocco may represent one of the last common ancestors of Neandertals, Denisovans and modern humans.

New research published today in Nature dates the bones—chipped out from a cave called Grotte à Hominidés and nearby it over decades—to about 773,000 years ago, during the era of the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens, Homo neanderthalensis and Denisovans (a group of humans that ranged across Asia and that does not have an agreed-upon species name).

“We can say that the shared ancestry between these three species is perhaps in Grotte à Hominidés in Casablanca,” says study co-author Abderrahim Mohib, a prehistorian at the National Institute of Archaeology and Heritage Sciences in Rabat, Morocco.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The cave is part of a quarry, where the first mandible was discovered in 1969. Another adult mandible and a string of vertebrae turned up in 2008, and part of a child’s mandible was unearthed in 2009. The hominin bones and animal remains make up an assemblage of fossils that appear to come from the den of a carnivore, perhaps a hyena. Among them, a hominin femur that was excavated from the cave bears teeth marks.

Four mandibles seen in profile against a black background

Mandibles from North Africa, illustrating variation among fossil hominins and modern humans. The fossils shown are Tighennif 3 from Algeria (upper left), ThI-GH-10717 from Thomas Quarry in Morocco (upper right), and Jebel Irhoud 11 from Morocco (lower left), compared with a mandible from a recent modern human (lower right). All specimens are shown at the same scale, allowing direct comparison of their size and shape.

Philipp Gunz, MPI EVA Leipzig; CC BY-SA 2.0

Researchers weren’t able to make much of this steady drip of hominin fossils until they figured out how old they were. The key to pinning that down was a method called magnetostratigraphy, says Serena Perini, one of the study authors and a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Milan. This method depends on the fact that Earth’s magnetic field flip-flops every few hundred thousand years. The polarity change can be detected in iron-rich minerals. There was a reversal 773,000 years ago, which allowed the researchers to pinpoint when the sediments surrounding the hominin fossils were laid down.

As to who the hominin bones belonged to, tiny anatomical features on them point to an in-between species—one with some traits that were reminiscent of older African hominin species such as Homo erectus and others that were similar to those seen in later African fossils and specimens from Eurasia, Mohib says. This suggests that the Moroccan fossils represent something of an in-between species. They’re similar in age to a Neandertal-like species from Spain called Homo antecessor that had previously been suggested as a possible common ancestor of modern humans, Neandertals and Denisovans. But the traits of the Grotte à Hominidés fossils are more of a mix of new and old.

“They display a combination of primitive and more advanced traits, indicating human populations close to this phase of divergence,” Mohib says. “They thus confirm the deep antiquity of our species’ African roots and highlight North Africa’s key role in the major stages of human evolution.”

These ancestors may have looked quite different from any of these three human lineages, says Antonio Rosas González, a paleoanthropologist at the National Museum of Natural Sciences in Spain, who was not involved in the research but wrote an editorial accompanying its publication. Traits such as a large, spherical skull and a prominent chin had not yet evolved, he says. “The Moroccan fossils document the beginning of a long evolutionary process.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe