JOIN US ON THE MONARCH MIGRATION. LEARN MORE.

These 4 bold projects could actually change our clean-energy future

Companies are making big bets on technology to solve lingering challenges in the clean-energy rollout. Here are four of the most ambitious projects

Daytime overhead view of the Guoxin Salt Cave Compressed Air Energy Storage project facility, a round structure with a rust-colored roof. Image provided by CFOTO/Future Publishing via Getty Images.

An aerial view of the Guoxin Salt Cave Compressed Air Energy Storage Project in Huai’an City, China.

CFOTO/Future Publishing via Getty Images

Two decades ago renewable energy was a bit player on the world stage. Today renewables account for nearly half of all global electrical capacity, according to the International Renewable Energy Agency, and there’s a lot more in the pipeline. It’s a stunning surge showing that the renewable revolution appears unstoppable. Clean energy still faces challenges, though. To meet them, countries and companies are taking some big swings to push this revolution into a new phase—with ambitious projects that may or may not pan out.

One of the most significant problems is that solar and wind are intermittent, and the lithium-ion batteries currently available can’t store enough energy from renewables to reliably meet demand. To squeeze the most juice out of solar and wind, we need longer-term storage, leading some in the industry—notably in China—to reach for a technology that has been shelved for decades. Chinese companies are also pushing the limits on how large and how far offshore turbines can be so they can take advantage of steadier, stronger winds. Other ventures are trying to broaden the appeal of geothermal energy and crack the code on tidal power, one of the biggest untapped sources of power on the planet. Here are some of the most audacious of these projects. —Andrea Thompson



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Geothermal Energy for (Almost) Anywhere

Pulling heat from the earth without perfect geology

Name of project: Fervo Energy’s Cape Station
Location: Utah
Name of technology: Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS)
Power generation: A projected 100 megawatts by early 2027, with 500 megawatts in total under construction

How it works: Fervo drills down and then sideways, creating a network of long fractures in rock as deep as almost 2,750 meters (although future depths may vary); it then pushes water through these cracks to draw heat out of the earth. The large network of fissures exposes much more water to much more hot rock than single-pipe geothermal setups do, increasing efficiency. To execute the design, Fervo has translated oil and gas fracking’s pressurized fluid injections from softer sedimentary shale rock to hotter, harder volcanic rock. (Experts say seismic monitoring is advanced enough that work can be paused if risks of quakes above magnitudes people can feel rise too high.) At a demonstration facility called Project Red, Fervo connected test wells to a preexisting power plant, where it has been generating three megawatts of power since late 2023.

Why it’s needed: Unlike solar and wind, geothermal energy can be used 24/7. But to be economical, traditional geothermal requires perfect geology: hot rock that water naturally passes through and a reliably recharged water source to keep the heat flowing. This necessity has limited its use to a handful of spots on Earth. By adding fractures, EGS creates more places where geothermal is economically feasible. Other companies have targeted different geothermal strategies, and geothermal has been met with a wave of enthusiasm from the U.S. government.

What the experts say: Jefferson Tester, a Cornell University engineering professor, says he’s excited by the work Fervo is doing but worries that the company might have promised its funders too much too soon. “You’ve got to prove that this thing actually works for a sustainable period of production,” he says. “The proof will come only with what you find out in the field.” (Fervo Energy did not reply to interview requests.) —Meghan Bartels

Schematic of an enhanced geothermal system. An injection well travels deep into the ground, creating fractures in hot granite which it then pushes water through. An extraction well pulls hot water back up into a geothermal plant that converts the energy into electricity.

Nick Bockelman


The Power of the Tides

Predictable motions of the ocean can provide reliable, renewable energy

Name of project: MeyGen
Location: Scotland
Name of technology: Tidal stream energy
Power generation: Six megawatts (increasing to 65 megawatts by 2031)

How it works: Since 2016, MeyGen, located between the Scottish mainland and the Orkney Islands, has been the world’s largest tidal stream energy project. It exploits the fact that the tides that ebb and flow along our planet’s coastlines carry tremendous energy, with a harvestable potential estimated at 1,200 terawatt-hours per year, more than a quarter of annual power generation in the U.S. That energy can be harnessed in much the same way that wind farms harness moving air. “In very simple layman’s terms, you’re putting a wind turbine underwater,” says Drew Blaxland, CEO of Proteus Marine Renewables, which developed MeyGen’s four 1.5-megawatt turbines. The turbine blades spin with each incoming and outgoing tide, capturing the ocean’s kinetic energy to power a generator that produces electricity.

Why it’s needed: Unlike other renewable energy sources, tides are highly predictable. “We can tell at any point in time, any day, exactly how much energy we’re producing,” Blaxland says, “which you can’t do with wind or solar.” Tides are as brutal as they are reliable, though; saltwater corrosion, ocean debris and the sheer force of rushing water often cause turbines to fail. But one of MeyGen’s turbines has reached a major milestone in performance, running for more than seven years without unplanned maintenance. Built on massive foundations and equipped with blades that adjust to align with the tide, the turbines are engineered to withstand extreme, fast-flowing marine currents. MeyGen plans to add 20 turbines by 2031, boosting its capacity to 65 megawatts. According to Ampeak Energy, which owns the project, the site could ultimately produce nearly 400 megawatts.

What the experts say: Although tidal energy will always be limited by geography and is unlikely to catch up to wind and solar anytime soon, it could account for 10 percent of the U.K.’s energy needs, Blaxland says. “They’ve had a great track record of long-term generation from multiple large machines,” says Brian Polagye, a mechanical engineer at the University of Washington who specializes in marine energy. “The hyperbole is well deserved.” —Cody Cottier

Schematic of an array of three submerged tidal turbines on the seafloor.

Nick Bockelman


Energy from Thin Air

With the need for long-term energy storage rising, a technology from the 1970s steps back into the limelight

Name of project: Huai’an Salt Cavern
Location: China
Name of technology: Compressed air energy storage
Power generation: 600 megawatts

How it works: When demand for electricity is low, surplus energy generated by solar and wind farms can be used to power compressors that squeeze air to high pressures and pump it into underground caverns. Then, when demand rises, the pressurized air can be released to generate power. This technology, known as compressed air energy storage (CAES), dates to the late 1970s but “never really made it into the mainstream,” says Paul Denholm, a senior research fellow at the National Laboratory of the Rockies.

In recent years, though, China has commissioned several CAES plants, including the world’s largest: the Huai’an Salt Cavern project, expected to power some 600,000 homes. Salt caverns are especially well suited to this purpose: rock salt is more or less impermeable and deforms to self-seal any fractures that may form, preventing the stored air from leaking out.

There is a potential problem with this type of energy storage: compressed air cools as it reexpands, meaning it has to be warmed before it can spin a turbine efficiently. This project hopes to solve that issue by storing thermal energy in molten salt and water to reheat the air.

Why it’s needed: The success of renewables depends on the ability to store energy for times when the sun isn’t shining and the wind isn’t blowing. The energy-storage market is currently dominated by lithium-ion batteries, but Denholm says they’re economically viable only for storage durations of a few hours. He argues that CAES, though expensive up front, is easier to scale and can store and supply energy for a day or longer, depending on the size of the cavern. “Air is free,” Denholm says, “and a hole in the ground can potentially be cheap.”

What the experts say: Although the technology is mature, according to Pirouz Kavehpour, a mechanical engineer at the University of California, Los Angeles, geology limits its potential. Outside of China there are only two major CAES plants in the world—in Germany and in Alabama—and both rely on salt caverns. But a recently permitted project in California would use hard-rock caverns, which could expand possibilities for the technology. “It’s been 30 years since we built one of these things in this country,” Denholm says, but he remains cautiously optimistic. —Cody Cottier

Schematic of a compressed air energy storage system. Energy from wind turbines and solar panels fuels a compressor that pushes air into a deep salt cavern. Air is pulled back up as needed, and is converted into electricity via a generator.

Nick Bockelman


Deep-Sea Offshore Wind

The world’s largest single floating wind turbine can withstand supertyphoons

Name of project: Sanxia Linghang Hao (Three Gorges Pilot) platform
Location: China
Name of technology: Floating offshore wind turbine
Power generation: 16 megawatts

How it works: China’s Sanxia Linghang Hao offshore wind turbine, installed in May, is the largest single floating turbine in the world. It floats some 70 kilometers offshore in more than 50 meters of water atop a partly submerged platform, rather than a piling embedded in the seafloor as most offshore turbines are, which would be too expensive in such deep waters. In its mooring system, polyester cables and anchor chains act as springs that help to absorb the force of waves and wind. The turbine’s blades, with a tip height of 270 meters, are built to withstand winds up to 264 kilometers per hour, according to Three Gorges Corporation, faster than those produced by the strongest typhoons. (The company did not reply to interview requests.)

Why it’s needed: Offshore winds are stronger and steadier than near-shore winds, so turbines far from coasts can deliver more power with better reliability than near-shore turbines. Perhaps 80 percent of potential offshore wind energy is in deep waters that require floating, anchored turbines. Far offshore, they also avoid the community complaints about visibility that plague near-shore wind farms. With the U.S. halting leases and permits for offshore wind facilities, the action on the technology has moved to Asia and Europe: Italy alone has about 90 far-offshore wind facilities under environmental review.

What the experts say: These offshore floating wind facilities are technologically mature and have “crystal clear” low-cost energy potential, says marine scientist Roberto Danovaro of Italy’s Marche Polytechnic University. The only real issue is their ecological impact, he says. “If adequately assessed, located and mitigated, their ecological and environmental impact can be negligible, and their benefits can be huge,” Danovaro says. —Dan Vergano

Schematic of a large semi-submersible wind turbine.

Nick Bockelman

Meghan Bartels is a science journalist based in New York City. She was previously a senior reporter at Scientific American. Before that she spent more than four years as a writer and editor at Space.com, as well as nearly a year as a science reporter at Newsweek, where she focused on space and Earth science. Her writing has also appeared in Audubon, Nautilus, Astronomy and Smithsonian, among other publications. She attended Georgetown University and earned a master’s degree in journalism at New York University’s Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program.

More by Meghan Bartels

Dan Vergano was formerly senior editor, Washington, D.C., at Scientific American. He has previously written for Grid News, BuzzFeed News, National Geographic and USA Today. He is chair of the New Horizons committee for the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing and a journalism award judge for both the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

More by Dan Vergano

Cody Cottier is a freelance journalist based in Fort Collins, Colo., who frequently covers evolution and the environment.

More by Cody Cottier

Andrea Thompson is senior desk editor for life science at Scientific American, covering the environment, energy and earth sciences. She has been covering these issues for nearly two decades. Prior to joining Scientific American, she was a senior writer covering climate science at Climate Central and a reporter and editor at Live Science, where she primarily covered earth science and the environment. She has moderated panels, including as part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Media Zone, and appeared in radio and television interviews on major networks. She holds a graduate degree in science, health and environmental reporting from New York University, as well as a B.S. and an M.S. in atmospheric chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Follow Thompson on Bluesky @andreatweather.bsky.social

More by Andrea Thompson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 335 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Big Bets in Green Tech” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 335 No. 2 (), p. 72
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican092026-4zWXgrczJFZM9QSgdQBh39

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe