New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Gene Swapping Helps Bacteria Adapt

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Bacteria, like all organisms, have to make a living in an ever changing world. They face shifting climates, varying food supplies and--horror of horrors--antibiotics. How do they adapt? According to the results of a new study, simply by copying the successful innovations of their relatives.

Martin Lercher of the University of Bath in England and his colleagues studied a benign strain of Escherichia coli to see how the common intestine dweller picked up new parts for its metabolic network--the internal system of chemical reactions that produce the necessities of life, such as amino acids or cellular structures. By comparing E. coli to its ancestor Salmonella the geneticists found that the former had only one new gene that likely came about through mutation. This means that in the roughly 100 million years since the two organisms diverged only one instance of a copying error led to a significant difference.

But the bacterium had as many as 32 genes in its metabolic network that it had pirated from near relatives, including those that enable it to defend itself against antibiotics. The team revealed that the bacteria do this by using a process known as horizontal gene transfer, in which a cell passes genetic information to another cell that is not its offspring. It is the bacterial equivalent of sex, with two cells sidling up to each other and engaging in conjugation, or the swapping of genes, except that they do not have to wait for progeny to see the benefits. Lercher and his collaborators determined that the genetic material most likely to be exchanged had to do with handling new environments or adding on new functions, rather than affecting E. coli's core processes, such as growth.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Published in the current issue of Nature Genetics, this is the first comprehensive investigation into how a bacterium's metabolic network changes over time. It suggests that scientists studying such evolution must account not just for mutations but also how the environment and a bacterium's relatives play a role in changing its abilities, possibly making it harmful. "Bacteria feel pressure to change in response to a changing world and they react by stealing genetic information from other, better adapted types of bacteria," Lercher says. "Bacteria are just as lazy as humans: why invent the wheel twice if someone else has already found a solution to your problem?"

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe