New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Gene Therapy for Broken Hearts

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Abnormal heart rhythms afflict about one in every hundred Americans. For some people, these disturbances are basically harmless. For others, however, being out-of-sync disrupts the heart¿s coordinated pumping and leads rapidly to death. Current treatment options include drug therapy, pacemakers and defibrillators--which cannot cure the condition and have considerable downsides. But if the results of a study published in the December issue of the journal Nature Medicine are any indication, gene therapy may at last offer a long term solution. According to the report, researchers have developed for the first time a gene therapy that settles arrhythmias in pig hearts--the animal hearts that most closely resemble those of humans.

J. Kevin Donahue and his colleagues set out to develop a way to deliver a gene known as an inhibitory G protein gene to one of the heart¿s own pacemakers, a tiny region of tissue called the atrioventricular node (AV). When instructed by the nervous system, this gene acts to slow the heart rate. The team selected a standard gene delivery vehicle, the adenovirus, and then treated 10 pig hearts with agents that enhance uptake of this gene and its viral carrier. They subsequently injected the gene therapy. A week later, tissue studies revealed that the gene had reached nearly half of the AV node. What¿s more, says Donahue, "The AV nodes in the test hearts carried impulses at a significantly slower rate and were far less excitable than those in hearts without the added genes."

The team really put the genetically enhanced hearts to the test when they applied electrical and chemical stimulation that normally produces arrhythmia. Still the animals that had received the G protein gene exhibited a 20 percent decrease in heart rate as compared to control animals. This result is similar to that offered by so-called beta blockers, a common medication, the team notes. "But we believe the gene therapy that ultimately would help humans would, unlike beta blockers, be a long-term solution," Donahue offers. "Also, because gene therapy is localized to a specific place in the heart, it would avoid the side effects that come when beta-blockers travel to other parts of the body."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe