New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Geoffrey Hinton

The machine-learning guru discusses how politics is undermining U.S. science

Geoffrey Hinton looking into the camera, against a Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences background.

Jonathan Nackstrand/AFP via Getty Images

This article is part of “The Young American Scientists,” which includes stories of 28 extraordinary scientists poised to change the world, as well as a deep look at the past, present and future of science and innovation in the U.S.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Geoffrey Hinton is a British‑Canadian computer scientist and cognitive psychologist known for pioneering artificial neural networks and deep learning. A professor at the University of Toronto, he shared the 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics for foundational work enabling modern machine learning.

[This interview was edited for length and clarity.]

How would you describe the current state of American science?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


I would say it is in a dire state because Trump is doing everything he can to undermine it.

America is still very good at innovation, but as it loses more and more of its leading scientists, it’s getting worse. The source of really revolutionary innovations is typically graduate students working in a well-informed group at a leading university, and that is exactly what the Trump government is undercutting by making it much harder and less attractive for foreign graduate students to come here and attacking the leading universities.

What needs to change in American science?

They need to stop attacking the major universities. They need to stop preventing scientists from other countries coming and working in the U.S. A lot of the U.S. advantage in science and technology has been because of immigrant scientists. They need to restore all the grants that they’ve cut off after [those grants] were awarded. And they need to stop, for political reasons, espousing views that are known to be wrong on things such as climate change, vaccines and the role of basic science. So all of the advances we’ve had, all of the major advances in our civilization, are to do with scientific advances, which only happen when you have institutions that protect scientific freedom and you get the best scientists.

What gives you optimism right now?

The midterms.

What’s your best advice for an early-career scientist?

That depends on whether they’re an American citizen. If they’re not an American citizen, I would advise them to be very cautious about working in the U.S.

How has your field changed in the past few years?

Artificial intelligence has changed a whole lot in the past few years because people have started really becoming aware of the extraordinary progress and the extraordinary risks that go with it. A good example is what happened when Anthropic made it public that it’s developed a coding agent that is very good at finding major flaws in all of the major operating systems. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. We can expect a lot more things like that over the next few years.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe