New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Giant Rotten-Smelling Parasite Flower Rafflesia Evokes Host Defenses

A host plant’s survival may depend on powerful chemicals swimming in its vines

Rafflesia blooming in Sumatra.

Rafflesia blooming in Sumatra.

mazzzur/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Little is known about how the parasitic Rafflesia—a genus that produces the world’s largest and stinkiest flower—infects its host plants. Rafflesia spends most of its life span as a tangle of strandlike cells lurking inconspicuously underneath the bark of a woody vine called Tetrastigma, before emerging as drab, golf ball–sized buds. These eventually burst into fleshy blooms that smell like rotting meat and can reach 20 pounds and three feet across. Since 2017, Long Island University plant biologist Jeanmaire Molina has been trying to infect Tetrastigma seedlings with Rafflesia seeds in the laboratory, so far without success; her latest work delves further into how some potential hosts manage to thwart this spectacular parasite.

For a new study in Planta, Molina and her colleagues extracted and screened over 10,000 chemicals produced by infected and noninfected Tetrastigma cuttings from rain forests in the Philippines. The researchers found that noninfected cuttings contained elevated levels of benzylisoquinoline alkaloids, a group of compounds that includes morphine and codeine.

Such substances have never been reported before in Tetrastigma or other creepers in the same family (which includes the common grape). Molina says she is intrigued that Tetrastigma can produce such biologically potent substances, and the precise reasons it does so are not yet known. She suspects Tetrastigma may brandish these alkaloids preemptively to stave off infection. Perhaps, she adds, Rafflesia’s opening gambit is to suppress this secretion and besiege its host.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In any case, the finding is “pretty surprising,” says Harvard University evolutionary biologist Charles Davis, who was not involved in the study. “Plants are incredible chemists.” He adds that the work is an important step toward demystifying interactions between parasite and host.

Next, Molina hopes to learn how to tip the balance toward Rafflesia. Her long-term goal is to bring some of these endangered flowers out of their Southeast Asian habitats and make them more accessible to the outside world. Learning how Tetrastigma’s defenses work—and how to subvert them—is a place to start.

Molina keeps a potted Tetrastigma in her university office, regularly sprinkling the plant with Rafflesia seeds in the hope they will miraculously catch. So far, nothing. But she still maintains the routine. “I think there is a way. We just don’t know it yet,” she says. “We’ll get there somehow.” 

Shi En Kim is a science writer based in Washington, D.C. Her work has appeared in Chemical & Engineering News, National Geographic, Hakai Magazine, Slate, Science News, and more. Follow her on Twitter @goes_by_kim

More by Shi En Kim
Scientific American Magazine Vol 326 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Parasite Challenge” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 326 No. 3 (), p. 22
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0322-22a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe