Giant Telescopes of the Future

The astronomical version of Moore's law says that telescopes double in size every few decades. But today's designers think they can build a telescope three, five or even 10 times bigger within a decade

By Roberto Gilmozzi

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Some of my best moments at Paranal Observatory in Chile are at night when, after a day of work, I go up "on deck," as we call the platform that hosts the four eight-meter-wide telescopes of the Very Large Telescope project (VLT). It is magical: the vast expanse of starry sky above, the smooth movements of the domes, the politically incorrect pleasure of smoking a pipe, the dark desert barely visible in its outline against the faintly opalescent horizon. As I stand there admiring the VLT, the most advanced set of telescopes in the world, its four 430-ton machines silently rotating in a complex ballet with the heavens, I reflect on how fortunate I am to be involved in such an awesome project. It is an achievement that all of humanity shares in. Like the other great telescopes of our day, such as the Keck Observatory, Hubble Space Telescope and Very Large Array, the VLT embodies the highest technologies that our civilization has to offer. If you traced the genesis of each part, you would find that, ultimately, it took millions of people to bring it into this world.

But astronomers never rest. The VLT had no sooner been built than many of us began to think about its successors, telescopes whose main mirrors would measure 25, 30 or even 100 meters in diameter. One concept that I have been deeply involved in designing is a behemoth called OWL (for its keen night vision and for being overwhelmingly large) that would almost fill the whole Paranal deck with its 100-meter mirror.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American