New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Global Warming Means Longer Flights, More Pollution

Airline flights could get longer and emit more CO2 in a warming world

Climate change is causing wind patterns to change over the Pacific Ocean, leading to longer commercial airline flight times and causing airplanes to burn more fuel and emit more greenhouse gases.

Those are the conclusions of a Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution study published Monday in the journal Nature Climate Change, showing that the shifting jet stream over the Pacific Ocean is increasing flight times between Hawaii and the U.S. mainland, leading to more of the pollution that fuels climate change.

Previous studies have shown that commercial airplanes will be affected by climate change primarily in terms of turbulence. But the U.S. government has recently made moves to look at how climate change is being exacerbated by commercial airplanes, which for account about 3 percent of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and about 0.5 percent globally.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Environmental Protection Agency announced in June that it plans to declare commercial airplane emissions a danger to public health because of the role they play in climate change — the first step in regulating airplanes’ emissions and engine fuel efficiency.

The Woods Hole study shows how airplanes flying into winds made stronger by both natural climate variability and man-made global warming will in turn make global warming even worse. The resulting additional greenhouse emissions from airplanes could increase total global emissions by 0.03 percent as roundtrip flight times across the globe increase, according to the study.

“What we found was that, for the particular airline routes that we focused on, the flight-level wind changes were such that westbound flights should take longer in the future while eastbound flights will be shorter,” study lead author Kristopher Karnauskas, an associate scientist of geology and geophysics at Woods Hole, said.

Shorter flights going eastbound burn less fuel, but the team found that the fuel savings going east didn’t cancel out the additional fuel burned on flights heading west toward Hawaii.

“Normally, when we think about the airline industry and climate change, we think about how global aviation contributes to climate change through such means as carbon dioxide and aerosol emissions — and for good reason,”  Karnauskas said. “However, in our study, we’re flipping this around. We’re trying to probe the extent to which climate change might influence the airline industry beginning with shorter-term natural cycles that we can readily observe with existing real-world data.”

Those cycles include the El Niño-Southern Oscilliation, or ENSO, and the Arctic Oscillation, which drive natural climate variability over the Pacific, including the position of the jet stream between Hawaii and North America.

Karnauskas’ team studied U.S. Department of Transportation data for 250,000 commercial flights between Honolulu and the West Coast, and compared them to observed winds at an airplane’s cruising altitude to understand how the flights are being affected by the wind patterns. They found a strong correlation between air travel times and fluctuations in the ENSO and Arctic Oscillation.

The team then analyzed 30 different global climate models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which show that in a warming world the jet stream may reposition itself in a way that forces airplanes to fly against stronger winds on routes between the mainland and Hawaii.

Researchers unaffiliated with the study said it shows the need for more research into the effects of commercial aviation on the climate.

“This study is focused primarily on one part of the total picture, as you know, and so points the way to larger studies assessing something more like the whole (airline industry) route structure as currently flown and what might be flown in a changing world,” Penn State geosciences professor Richard B. Alley said.

In showing that commercial flight times will increase in a warming world, the study illustrates that everyone’s lives will be touched by climate change in some way and that people will need to adapt, he said.

Manoj Joshi, senior lecturer in climate dynamics at the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom, said the study shows how cruising altitudes over the northeastern Pacific can be altered by both climate variability and climate change and that increasing airplane fuel efficiency would make airplanes less sensitive to those changes.

“It’s a jolly interesting study that shows yet another way in which climate change and variability affect the human world,” he said.

You May Also Like: Warming Waters Fueled Intense Russian Rainstorm Rapidly Acidifying Arctic Ocean Threatens Species Alaska’s Glaciers Seen as Major Source of Sea Level Rise Three Ways The World’s Power Mix Is About To Change

This article is reproduced with permission from Climate Central. The article was first published on July 13, 2015.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe