New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Some of the Best Science Can Slumber for Years

Discovery lies at the core of science, but rediscovery can be just as important. Indiana University Bloomington researchers combed through 22 million scientific papers published over the past century and found, to their surprise, dozens of “Sleeping Beauties”—studies that sat dormant for years and then suddenly got noticed. The top finds—the ones that languished in obscurity the longest and later got the most intense attention from the scientific community—came from chemistry, physics and statistics. What tended to wake up these sleeping findings? Scientists from other disciplines, such as the medical field, in search of fresh insights, as well as the ability to test once theoretical postulations. Qing Ke, a graduate student in informatics who worked on the project, says that most likely Sleeping Beauties will become even more common in the future because of the increasing availability and accessibility of scientific literature.

Many of these reawakened findings have been covered by Scientific American:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


#2: “Preparation of Graphitic Oxide”
Carbon Wonderland (April 2008)

#4: “Wettability of Porous Surfaces”
Self-Cleaning Materials: Lotus Leaf-Inspired Nanotechnology (August 2008)

Ferry Tale: Fire Ants Aggregate into Living Rafts to Escape Floods (April 2011)
(Both articles discuss the Cassie–Baxter law of wetting, which explains that increasing the roughness of a surface can increase its water repellency.)

#5: “A study of the Nucleation and Growth Processes in the Synthesis of Colloidal Gold”
The Midas Touch: Using Gold Nanoparticles to Block HIV (June 2008)
Gold Nanowires Grow on Their Own (November 2001)

#9: “Resistance of Solid Surfaces to Wetting by Water”
Lotus Leaf Inspires Waterproofing Scheme (March 2003)
How to Make Materials Everything-Proof (November 2008)

#11: “The Constitution and Fundamental Properties of Solids and Liquids”
Articles written by the study’s author, Irving Langmuir (1920, 1933, 1937).

#14: “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?”
What Einstein Really Thought about Quantum Mechanics (September 2015)
Was Einstein Right? (September 2004)

Full Citations:

1. “Concerning Adsorption in Solutions,” by H. Z. Freundlich in Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie, Vol. 57, 444–448; 1906.

2. “Preparation of Graphitic Oxide,” by William Hummers, Jr., and Richard Offeman in Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 80, No. 6; March 1958.

3. “The Scherrer Formula for X-Ray Particle Size Determination,” by A. Patterson in Physical Review Letters, Vol. 56, No. 978; November 15, 1939.

4. “Wettability of Porous Surfaces,” by A. Cassie and S. Baxter, in Transactions of the Faraday Society, Vol. 40, 546–551; 1944.

5. “A Study of the Nucleation and Growth Processes in the Synthesis of Colloidal Gold,” by John Turkevich et al, in Discussions of the Faraday Society, Vol. 11, 55–75; 1951.

6. “On Lines and Planes of Closest Fit to Systems of Points in Space,” by Karl Pearson, in Philosophical Magazine, 559–572; 1901.

7. “The Tension of Metallic Films Deposited by Electrolysis,” by G. Gerald Stoney in Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, Vol. 82, No. 553; May 6, 1909.

8. “Emulsions,” by Spencer Pickering in Journal of the Chemical Society, Transactions, Vol. 91; 1907.

9. “Resistance of Solid Surfaces to Wetting by Water,” by Robert Wenzel in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 28, No. 8, 988–994; 1936.

10. “Probable Inference, the Law of Succession and Statistical Inference,” by Edwin Wilson in Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 22, No. 158, 209–212; June 1927.

11. “The Constitution and Fundamental Properties of Solids and Liquids, Part 1: Solids,” by Irving Langmuir in Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 38, No. 11; 1916.

12. “Note on an Approximation Treatment for Many-Electron Systems,” by Chr. Møller and M. S. Plesset in Physical Review, Vol. 46, No. 618; October 1, 1934.

13. “Relations between the Elastic Moduli and the Plastic Properties of Polycrystalline Pure Metals,” by S. F. Pugh in The London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, Vol. 45, No. 367; 1954.

14. “Can Quantum-Mechanical Descriptions of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?,” by Albert Einstein et al in Physical Review, Vol. 47, No. 777; May 15, 1935.

15. “The Dynamics of Capillary Flow,” by Edward Washburn in Physical Review, Vol. 17, No. 273; March 1, 1921.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe