Pity the poor atmospheric disturbance that crosses paths with Jupiter's Great Red Spot, a storm as large as two to three Earths that has raged for at least several hundred years.
NASA, ESA, A. Simon-Miller (Goddard Space Flight Center), N. Chanover (New Mexico State University), and G. Orton (Jet Propulsion Laboratory)
Join Our Community of Science Lovers!
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Pity the poor atmospheric disturbance that crosses paths with Jupiter's Great Red Spot, a storm as large as two to three Earths that has raged for at least several hundred years. These images taken by the Hubble Space Telescope over a period of three months show the storm gobbling up "baby red spot" [arrow; right panel], a smaller storm that formed earlier this year. Gliding safely past this smashup was Red Spot, Jr. [red ring], which turned from white to red in January 2006 and has now snuck by its larger counterpart twice without being chomped. The different colored bands and storms in Jupiter's 30-mile- (50-kilometer-) thick atmosphere reflect varying chemical compositions and temperatures of gases in those regions. Researchers are still unsure what mechanism powers the Great Red Spot. They hope that studying the demise of baby red spot may shed some light on the forces at work
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
Thank you,
Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American
