Groodyear's India Rubber Extension Case

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Messrs. Editors.—The important Good-year's vulcanized India :|;ubber extension case has been progressing at the Patent Office this week. The patent of Chas. Goodyear for vulcanized gum elastic, dated June 15, 1844, expires on the 15th of this month, unless the Commissioner grants an extension of seven years before the expiration of that date. This patent of Goodyear's consists in treating rubber with sulphur and heat. The friends or licensees of Goodyear have put forth the most strenuous efforts to obtain an extension of this patent, and the public has also been actively engaged in opposing the extension. The Examiner, Dr. Thos. Antisell, who has the case in charge, after an immense amount of labor, has presented a very able and elaborate report in the matter. It shows that Chas. Goodyear has personally received $114, 000 profit from the vulcanizing patent alone, and after pointing out that great discrepancies existed in the account furnished by Mr. Goodyear in his petition, it recommends that perhaps the extension had better be granted, as it seems hard to send such a n^an of genius into the world penniless at the age of 58, who has done so much for the encouragement of the arts. It is also alleged by Mr. Goodyear, in his petition, that he is poor and in very feeble health. Messrs. Blatchford and Brady, eminent lawyers from New York, are counsel for Goodyear, and Stoughton, Greenough, Stansbury, and others, counsel for the American and European public. The case in behalf of the latter was very ably argued by Mr. Stoughton of New York, and in behalf of Goodyear by Mr. Brady, in a very learned and dignified manner. The case will be decided by the Commissioner before the 15th inst., and doubtless a just decision will be tendered, as he is fully qualified to decide in a matter of this magnitude. It is alleged that millions of money hang on this case. Mr. Goodyear is certainly a man of genius, as the hundred different applications of his invention now on exhibition in the gallery of the Patent Office abundantly testify ; among which may be seen almost every kind of stationary articles, carpetings, tents, awnings, coverings, spreads ; house, ship, and camp utensils ; packing, sheathing, and caulkings; valves, stops, springs, wearing apparel, life preservers, be^s, combs ; surgical, medical, and philosophical instruments, and a host of other things too numerous to mention. F. Washington, June 11, 1858. [Our correspondent will notice in another place an article bearing upon the extension of patents by the Commissioner. This is, undoubtedly, a very important case, of which fact, no doubt, the Commissioner is fully impressed. It strikes us as somewhat queer that if Goodyear has received $114,000 for the vulcanizing patent alone, he should now appear before the Patent Office " penniless at the age of fifty-eight." We shall be able to give the decision in the case next week. Dr. James Dean died on the 9th inst., at his residence in Greenfield, Mass. He was distinguished as a geologist, and was engaged on a work relating to the bird-tracks in the sandstone of the Connecticut valley, at the time of his decease. It was to be published by the Smithsonian Institution. Propeller steamships appear to be fast superseding paddle wheel vessels, both in regard to speed and economy. Those running on the Atlantic make quicker voyages in proportion j to their tunnage than the crack steamers of ^ the Cunard line. ^

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 41This article was published with the title “Groodyear's India Rubber Extension Case” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 41 (), p. 325
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican06191858-325c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe