New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Heart Cells Can Be Coaxed to Regenerate at Low Rates

New research shows that the heart does have a limited ability to heal itself, and that small snippets of RNA can be used to stimulate this capacity

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Can heart cells renew themselves, and can scientists help them do so? Two papers published online in Nature today suggest that heart muscle cells can make copies of themselves at a very low rate, but that a genetic trick can prompt them to do a better job. Those results give hope that hearts damaged by cardiovascular disease — which causes the deaths of almost 17 million people a year — could be coaxed to regenerate themselves.  

Heart muscle cannot renew itself very well. Researchers would like to help that process by finding populations of cells in the heart that can do so, and then boosting that capacity. But it has not been easy to find evidence of these regenerating cells, or to assess the extent of their powers.     

The two Nature papers aim to get to the heart of the matter. In one, a team led by Richard Lee at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, both in Boston, Massachusetts, traced the birth and fate of heart muscle cells in mice. Lee and his colleagues found that a small proportion of heart cells — less than 1% — can regenerate themselves normally. After a heart attack that proportion goes up, but only to 3%.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“These studies dispel any notion of the heart having a robust ability to regenerate,” says Charles (Chuck) Murry, who studies heart regeneration at the University of Washington in Seattle.

Heart hope
That those cells exist at all is heartening, however. “If there is some capacity for the heart to produce new heart muscle cells, that’s a foothold that we can work with,” says Matthew Steinhauser, a co-author on the paper1 and a member of Lee’s lab. Then, he says, the team can ask: “Can we make it work better?”.A second group has done just that. Mauro Giacca and his colleagues at the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology in Trieste, Italy, used small snippets of RNA called microRNAs to stimulate heart cells to start regenerating.

The researchers screened hundreds of microRNAs for the ability to prompt mouse and rat heart cells to proliferate. The team then induced heart attacks in live mice and showed that two particular microRNAs helped to build the damaged hearts back up again so that they were functioning almost normally. After two months, the size of the area of tissue killed off by the heart attack was reduced by half, and the heart’s capacity to pump blood was significantly improved.

The microRNAs need further testing in larger animal models with more human-like hearts, says Giacca. Other scientists would like to see the results confirmed.

“Those who know this field have seen many claims of heart regeneration that have not withstood the test of time,” says Murry. “If this study can be reproduced, it will be a major breakthrough.”

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on December 5, 2012.

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe