New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Heart Rhythms Seem Circadian in Nature

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The chances of suffering heart problems are not equal throughout the day. Heart attacks occur more often around 10 o'clock in the morning than any other time, a peak that previously was attributed to daily behavior patterns getting underway. A report published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences indicates that the heartbeats of healthy people, too, exhibit strong circadian rhythms, which could help explain the morning crest of adverse cardiac events.

Steven A. Shea of Harvard Medical School and his colleagues studied healthy individuals between the ages of 20 and 33 years old. The volunteers lived in individual suites for 10 days and had their regular daily patterns disrupted. They were monitored closely and asked to adhere to specific sleep and wake cycles while having their heartbeats monitored using electrocardiograms. The team discovered that a feature of the subjects' heartbeats known as the scaling exponent, which is a statistical classification of beats over time, displayed a significant 24-hour rhythm regardless of daily activities. What is more, the peak occurred between nine and 11 a.m.

According to the report, the findings suggest that "the underlying mechanism of cardiac regulation is strongly influenced by the endogenous circadian pacemaker." And because higher scaling exponents are associated with heart disease, the scientists posit that this fundamental pattern could influence vulnerable people, such as those suffering from congestive heart failure, and contribute to the pattern of early morning heart attacks observed in epidemiological studies.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe