New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Heat Waves Are Causing Mass Fish Deaths in Australia

Drought conditions and poor water management have contributed to the events

Murray-Darling Basin.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Hundreds of thousands of native fish in Australia’s Darling River have died following a major outbreak of blue–green algae and some severe weather. Two mass die-offs have been reported near Menindee in western New South Wales—the first was late last year, and the second last week.

Outbreaks of blue–green algae (cyanobacteria), which thrive in warm water, are not uncommon during droughts. The algae did not directly cause the mass die-off; rapid cooling and intense rainfall might have disrupted the bloom and depleted the amount of dissolved oxygen in the water, killing the fish, said Anthony Townsend, a senior fisheries manager at the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, in a statement.

But low water levels in the river have compounded the die-offs, which have greatly affected native species such as bony herring (Nematalosa erebi), golden and silver perch (Macquaria ambigua and Bidyanus bidyanus, respectively) and the vulnerable Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii) . “Unfortunately, the main causes of this distressing event are the lack of water flowing into the northern rivers, and the impact of 100 years of over-allocation of precious water resources throughout the entire basin,” says the Murray–Darling Basin Authority, a statutory agency that oversees the basin through which the river flows.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Basin plan

The basin supports around 40% of Australia’s agricultural production by value, with much of the water going to dairy farming, cotton and rice. But removing water for agriculture has caused major environmental problems, including increased salinity and reduced river flows, and the system is now under threat.

In 2012, state and national governments agreed on an Aus$13-billion (US$9.4-billion) plan to reallocate 3.2 trillion litres of water to the environment, through a mix of buying back water allocations from farmers and installing water-efficiency infrastructure, by 2024.

But an independent assessment of the basin plan in 2017 concluded that its progress had stalled and was at risk of failing, in part because the national government had reduced the amount of water that could be bought and returned to environmental flows. Sarah Hanson-Young, a member of the Australian Greens party, says this has contributed to the current low water flows, and has urged the government to return more water to the environment.

Bill Shorten, the leader of the country’s opposition Labor party, has called for the government to establish an emergency scientific taskforce to investigate the die-offs.

Agencies have warned that further die-offs are likely over the next few months, with heatwaves forecast across south-eastern Australia this week and dry conditions set to continue.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on January 15, 2019.

Bianca Nogrady is a freelance science journalist based in Sydney, Australia.

More by Bianca Nogrady

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe