New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Hegseth says U.S. military no longer requires flu vaccination, drawing criticism from health experts

The decision to no longer enforce mandatory annual flu shots for military personnel could mean more troops will get sick during flu season, one expert says

Pete Hegseth at a podium

U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth speaks during a press briefing at the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., on April 16, 2026.

SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Updated April 21, 2026 at 5:15 PM

The U.S. military will no longer require service members to be vaccinated against the flu, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said in a social media post on Tuesday, a decision that some health experts say could endanger troops.

“The War Department is once again restoring freedom to our Joint Force. We are discarding the mandatory flu vaccine requirement, effective immediately,” Hegseth wrote in the post.

The policy stands in contrast to the current recommendations of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the country’s highest public health body, which says all Americans over the age of six months who do not have contraindications should get the annual flu shot. The CDC estimates that the vaccine saved some 12,000 lives and prevented about 180,000 hospitalizations during the 2024–2025 flu season.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Flu vaccines are the best tools we have to protect people from severe disease,” says Jennifer Nuzzo, a professor of epidemiology at Brown University. The vaccine might not always prevent the flu, but it effectively lowers the risk of hospitalization and severe disease, she explains.

It's also a matter of national security, experts say. “I can’t understand why you would make this decision if troop readiness was important,” says Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota. The data behind the flu vaccine are “clear and compelling” on both safety and the vaccine’s ability to reduce serious illness hospitalizations and deaths, he says. “The data have been repeatedly confirmed to show that across all ages.”

“This is an irresponsible decision that will undermine the medical readiness of our troops,” says Georges Benjamin, CEO of the American Public Health Association. “[Hegseth] clearly demonstrates his unfitness to command our nation’s military forces.”

“In the military, vaccination is not political theater. It is force protection. Troops live and work in close quarters, where influenza can spread quickly and sideline otherwise healthy service members,” Richard Ricciardi, a professor at the George Washington University School of Nursing, who served in the U.S. Army for more than three decades, told CNN.

Notably, some of the first reported U.S. cases of flu during the 1918 pandemic were in soldiers from Kansas who carried the virus with them into their camp, where it then is believed to have spread to the rest of the country and on to the rest of the world.

“If fewer military personnel are vaccinated against the flu, it would likely mean more troops getting sick during the flu season, which would compromise the battle readiness of our armed forces and increase the health care costs that the U.S. government pays,” Nuzzo says. “With an increasing number of global engagements that seems like a particularly shortsighted policy.”

Editor’s Note (4/21/26): This is a breaking news story and will be updated.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe