New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Hidden structural features inside Egypt’s Great Pyramid may have helped it withstand earthquakes, new study finds

Constructed by ancient Egyptians, the Great Pyramid has survived multiple earthquakes through the ages—now researchers think they know why

A lateral view of the Great Pyramid of Giza with detail on its weathered surface.

The Great Pyramid of Giza.

Nicola Micheletti/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Great Pyramid of Giza, also known as the Khufu pyramid, is among the most famous wonders of the ancient world. It is also a wonder that the structure is still standing—given that it was erected some 4,600 years ago and has had to withstand significant weathering and seismic activity over that time, including earthquakes in 1847 and 1992. Why the pyramid could withstand such trauma hasn’t been fully understood, but now scientists are beginning to unearth some answers.

In a new study published on Thursday in Scientific Reports, researchers took dozens of measurements from inside the Khufu pyramid to characterize its “fundamental frequency,” a measure that can inform how a building might respond during an earthquake.

You can think of a building’s fundamental, or natural, frequency like the sway of a swing, says Mohamed ElGabry, the study’s lead author and a professor at Egypt’s National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics. It might take a lot of force to move the swing from a still position. But at a certain point, even just a small push to a moving swing can send it flying. A similar effect happens in structures: a building’s natural sway affects how it responds during “pushes”—or earthquakes. If a structure has the same frequency as the ground below it, that can amplify the effects of an earthquake, he says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That’s not the case for the Khufu pyramid, ElGabry and his colleagues found. They discovered that most of the structure has around the same frequency, an average of about 2.3 hertz (Hz). That’s much higher than the ground’s frequency of about 0.6 Hz.

Person taking measurements in dark chamber.

Field measurements are taken in the Relieving Chambers of the Great Pyramid. The inscription visible on the left-hand side commemorates the discovery of the top four chambers by Western archaeologists in 1837.

Today engineers often make similar measurements to assess the earthquake safety of buildings. But the new findings are “very important,” ElGabry says, because nobody had made such measurements for the Great Pyramid before.

In this case, the Khufu pyramid’s natural frequency, aided by “pressure-relieving chambers” within the pyramid, appear to have protected it from earthquakes for thousands of years. It was also built on a limestone plateau, “a very strong and massive stone,” which helps the pyramid resist damage from earthquakes, ElGabry says.

“I was not surprised, but I was impressed,” he adds.

layout of pyramid

A diagram of the inside structure of the Great Pyramid.

There is no indication, however, that the ancient Egyptians who built the pyramid were aware of these dynamics. “It doesn’t mean they knew, at that time, all the physics we know today. For sure they didn’t,” ElGabry says.

But if you look at the design of the pyramids of Giza, as well as other ancient structures such as the Bent Pyramid—which, as its name suggests, has a “bend” in its shape—in the Egyptian site of Dahshur and the stacked rectangular prism construction of the Step Pyramid of Djoser, it’s clear that ancient pyramid builders were “learning by doing,” ElGabry says, adapting to their surrounding environment and using the resources they had on hand to build structures that would be as strong as possible.

“They used it very wisely to build in a very efficient way that survived,” he says.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe