New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Highly Invasive Spotted Lanternflies May Have a Surprising Weakness: Vibrations

Spotted lanternflies are sometimes drawn to power line vibrations—and scientists are taking notice

A close-up of a lanternfly shown in a natural setting.

Cwieders/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Ever since the seemingly indestructible spotted lanternfly began to infiltrate the U.S. East Coast in 2014, the hunt has been on for a way to stop it. The bug has devastated trees, grapevines, and other fruit crops, earning it a listing of potentially the most destructive invasive insect in 150 years by Pennsylvania State University. Its excrement, called “honeydew” by entomologists, feeds sooty mold and draws stinging insects. Managing the pest has proved difficult; it has no natural predator, and thus far there is no foreseeable end to its plaguing swarms.

USDA researchers have now found that lanternflies have an affinity for certain vibrations, they report in the Journal of Economic Entomology. “There was an anecdotal rumor that they were gathering near power lines,” says study co-author Richard Mankin, an entomologist with the USDA Agricultural Research Service. For the new study, the team members wanted to see whether vibrations influence the bugs’ movements on a surface. They found that in a laboratory setup, the bugs detected and moved toward 60-hertz vibrations (the common buzzlike frequency of power lines) generated with a speaker, says Miriam Cooperband, an entomologist with the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, who designed the study.

This reaction suggested the creatures might communicate using surface-transmitted vibrations, so Cooperband and her colleagues are now examining the vibrations the lanternflies produce. Understanding such communication signals may be key to setting an effective trap, Cooperband says. Beyond frequencies that attract the lanternflies, “there might be other types of signals that, when applied a certain way, might jam their communication and disrupt mating or even drive them away,” she says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Many attempts have been made to vanquish the spotted lanternfly, but its behavior differs from that of other pests that entomologists are used to managing, Mankin says. For example, lanternfly females and nymphs gather in massive swarms, called aggregations, that are not clearly tied to mating—so the typical pest-control method of disrupting reproduction is difficult to apply.

“The lanternfly is a freak bug, and there’s a long way to go to unlock all its secrets,” says Brian Walsh, a horticulture educator at Penn State who has also been investigating how to effectively manage the pest. He says that although this new research is interesting, it needs more refinement before it might produce a broadly usable pest-management approach. “I hope that it does work out and that a scalable tool can be developed as a lure for the spotted lanternfly that produces more than a hyperlocalized impact,” he says. “That would be a massive game changer in our management efforts, as none currently exist.”

Claire Marie Porter is a Pennsylvania-based freelance journalist who writes about health and environmental sciences. Her recent work appears in Undark Magazine and the Atlantic.

More by Claire Marie Porter
Scientific American Magazine Vol 331 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Lanternfly Vibe” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 331 No. 1 (), p. 14
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican072024-2pWw9NHS5qYHebJSxsB2xq

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe