New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Hormone Harms Hearing

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A popular form of hormone replacement therapy (HRT), which is often used to stave off the changes associated with female aging, can accelerate hearing loss. University of Rochester researchers led by Robert D. Frisina found that women who were taking a combination of estrogen and progestin had hearing deficits typically expected in women five to 10 years older. The study of 124 women between the ages of 60 and 86 points to progestin as the culprit, because the hearing of participants who took estrogen alone was unaffected by the treatment.

Previous studies have also documented slight hearing loss in women taking birth-control pills containing progestin and in younger women during the stage of their menstrual cycles when progesterone, the hormone's natural form, is at its highest level. Yet women still have better overall hearing than men up until menopause, a benefit attributed to natural estrogen.

Frisina thinks that the progestin-induced damage detected in the study may arise when nerve cell membranes are exposed to a progestin metabolite, allopregnanolone: the cells become less excitable, or responsive, to stimulation. If that is the mechanism at work, then the nerve cells in the HRT group with hearing loss may be dampened but not dead, suggesting that the effect is reversible. Frisina's group plans to study next what happens to women's hearing when they stop HRT.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Frisina would like to see drug companies perform similar sensory testing during development of HRT products and release any results they may already have. “It might be valuable information,” he says. In the meantime, the hearing risk “should be part of the conversation when a woman and her doctor discuss HRT,” he adds, particularly for women who already have hearing loss.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe