New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

House Call for Defibrillators

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: learncpr.org

Mickey Eisenberg sounds a new controversial suggestion in an editorial in today's issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association: Make automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) available for purchase over-the-counter so that people might have them at home. There are now many plans to get these devices out of the ER and into public spaces like gyms, planes, sports arenas and government office buidlings. But AEDs in public spaces, Eisenberg argues, would help only about 16 percent of the annual cardiac arrest cases in the U.S.

In contrast, as many as 75 percent of people who die suddenly of heart disease--the leading cause of death among U.S. adults--do so at home. Were defibrillators and trained family members at hand, the editorial suggests, many might be saved. "CPR has become a lay procedure--anybody can learn it, and it is assumed that bystanders will use it in emergency situations," says Eisenberg, who created a site for teaching CPR (right). "Similarly, there is growing awareness that defibrillation is moving into the community."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Current obstacles to Eisenberg's dream of home defibrillation are not insignificant. For one thing, the devices are expensive, starting at about $3,000. Also, the Food and Drug Administration must first be convinced that--with sufficient labeling and instruction--the devices are safe and efficient. But for Eisenberg, who has received funding from defibrillator manufacturers, the campaign is not new. See his article in the June 1998 issue of Scientific American.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe