New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How Scientists Made Nano-Microscopes That Won the Chemistry Nobel Prize

Using light-emitting proteins in two different ways let researchers peer within living cells

The 2014 chemistry Nobel prize has been given to three pioneers of biomedical imaging, whose work has enabled nanoscale features within cells to be captured in exquisite detail. Eric Betzig of Howard Hughes Medical Institute, US, Stefan Hell of the Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Germany, and WE Moerner of Stanford University, US, will share the prize for ‘the development of super-resolved fluorescence microscopy’.

The techniques they developed enabled extremely high resolution images to be produced using optical microscopy. Their work circumvented the problem of the ‘diffraction limit’ – the inability of light microscopy to distinguish between structures smaller than half the wavelength of visible light or about 200nm. This advance allowed nanoscale structures – including individual molecules – to be visualised within cells while they are still alive, something that isn’t possible with techniques such as electron microscopy.

‘Most of the processes in chemistry and biochemistry take place at length scales that are much smaller [than the wavelength of light],’ said Sven Lidin, of the chemistry Nobel prize committee, speaking at the announcement. ‘The work of the laureates has made it possible to study molecular processes in real time.’


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In 2000, Hell’s group at the Max Planck Institute developed Stimulated Emission Depletion (STED) to produce much higher quality light microscopy images. STED uses one laser to excited fluorescent molecules that have been introduced into a sample to help visualise it. A second laser is then used to quench the fluorescence of all but a tiny nanometre-sized area at the centre of the two lasers. By scanning the sample with these lasers, a single nanometre-wide strip at a time, a much higher resolution picture of structures like cell’s organelles can be built up, as the light from the other fluorescent molecules that would create a fuzzier picture is cancelled out.

Single molecule snapshots
Separately, Betzig and Moerner – both working in industry at the time – laid the foundation for another technique called single fluorophore microscopy by showing that it was possible to detect the light emitted by a single fluorescent molecule. Working with this knowledge they showed that it was possible to build up a high resolution image, snapshot by snapshot, by introducing tiny amounts of fluorescent proteins into a sample. They created their high resolution image by exciting just a few fluorescent proteins in a sample at a time using a weak light pulse. As the fluorescent proteins were few and far between in the sample, those that glowed were generally more than 200nm apart – the diffraction limit for optical microscopy. When the excited fluorescent proteins had ‘burnt out’ they repeated the excitation process again and again, taking lots of snapshots of the fluorescent proteins spread throughout the sample. These images could then be overlaid to build up a high resolution picture of the sample, once again circumventing the limit imposed on optical microscopy by light’s wavelength.

In the years since, these imaging tools have enabled molecular biologists to track the movement of signalling molecules or disease markers within individual cells, for example mapping the molecular changes within an individual nerve cell during learning.

Speaking by telephone at the announcement, Hell told reporters he was ‘totally surprised’ to have received the award, and spoke about some of the challenges during the early stages of his research. ‘The scientific community wasn’t very receptive to the idea of overcoming the diffraction barrier,’ he said, ‘but I realised that you do not overcome the diffraction barrier by changing the waves of light, but by playing with the molecules. That’s why I was so confident and kept on going despite all the issues and problems that kept on coming up in the interim.’

‘Betzig, Hell and Moerner’s work to improve the resolution of traditional light microscopy has enabled scientists to bring their understanding of physiological processes into much sharper focus,’ said Dominic Tildesley, president of the Royal Society of Chemistry. He adds that the techniques they developed are ‘revealing whole new levels of understanding as to what is going on in the human body down to the nanoscale’.

Steven Lee from the University of Cambridge, UK, who was a postdoctoral researcher in Moerner’s lab at Stanford, thinks the news is ‘outstanding’. ‘These exciting discoveries have emerged through painstaking years of research by physical scientists trying to better understand how light interacts with matter at a fundamental level,’ he tells Chemistry World. ‘I was lucky enough to work with W E Moerner – his curious and passionate approach to science is an inspiration to us all.’

 

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on October 8, 2014

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe